Search Criteria
Package Details: pkgbrowser 0.28.1-4
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/pkgbrowser.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | pkgbrowser |
Description: | A utility for browsing pacman databases and the AUR |
Upstream URL: | https://codeberg.org/kachelaqa/pkgbrowser |
Licenses: | GPL2 |
Submitter: | kachelaqa |
Maintainer: | kachelaqa |
Last Packager: | kachelaqa |
Votes: | 283 |
Popularity: | 0.91 |
First Submitted: | 2011-04-20 18:18 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-12-23 20:29 (UTC) |
Dependencies (6)
- pacman (pacman-gitAUR)
- python (python37AUR, python311AUR, python310AUR)
- python-pyqt5 (python-pyqt5-sip4AUR, python-pyqt5-webkitAUR)
- python-setuptools (make)
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 20 Next › Last »
kachelaqa commented on 2018-09-01 10:48 (UTC)
@indianahorst It's not a dependency - you need to rebuild.
indianahorst commented on 2018-09-01 09:27 (UTC) (edited on 2018-09-01 09:35 (UTC) by indianahorst)
Any dependency seems to be missing:
Could you please add the required dependency?
Kr1ss commented on 2018-08-06 14:11 (UTC)
I've just built the package with the python dependency changed to 'python<3.8'. Building and running without issues so far.
stef204 commented on 2018-08-06 14:02 (UTC)
"installing python (3.7.0-3) breaks dependency 'python<3.7' required by pkgbrowser"
Can you please check into it/update, etc.?
rafaelff commented on 2018-05-29 14:07 (UTC)
@keepitsimpleengr: uninstall pkgbrowser, update pacman, install pkgbrowser again.
keepitsimpleengr commented on 2018-05-29 13:35 (UTC)
pkgbrowser: installing pacman (5.1.0-1) breaks dependency 'pacman<5.1'
so "pacman<5.2 (pacman-buildenv_ext-git, pacman-git)" seems in error
slav commented on 2018-05-29 11:53 (UTC)
@siliconmeadow - thank you
confirmed, adding below line: depends=('pacman>=4.1' 'pacman<5.1' 'python>=3.2' 'python<3.7' 'python-pyqt5')
resolving pacman dependency issue
siliconmeadow commented on 2018-05-29 07:36 (UTC)
I just did a tweak of PKGBUILD and it seems ok with Pacman 5.1.
lpc123 commented on 2018-05-29 01:02 (UTC)
Will this package be upgraded to support Pacman v5.1.0 - libalpm v11.0.0?
rafaelff commented on 2017-02-15 02:22 (UTC)
« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 .. 20 Next › Last »