Package Details: pkgcacheclean 1.9.0-3

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: pkgcacheclean
Description: Application to clean the pacman package cache
Upstream URL:
Licenses: GPL
Submitter: Auguste
Maintainer: dbermond
Last Packager: dbermond
Votes: 103
Popularity: 0.002443
First Submitted: 2010-10-18 08:11
Last Updated: 2019-05-26 13:36

Latest Comments

1 2 3 Next › Last »

dbermond commented on 2019-11-03 13:58

@karhu A rebuild against the installed pacman version is sufficient, so it links against the current Don't know why a rebuild is not working for you, because it should work.

karhu commented on 2019-10-26 16:44


I got this error message :

error while loading shared libraries:

I think it's because pacman was updated to version 5.2. For the same message with package-query I solved it with a rebuild, but with pkgcacheclean it didn't work.

What can I do ? Thanks for your help.

(may be the second one message).

shulamy commented on 2019-06-08 13:10

OK thanks

rufovillosum commented on 2019-06-04 11:27

Getting the following from gpg:

sudo gpg --recv-keys 019A7474297D8577 gpg: key 019A7474297D8577: 4 signatures not checked due to missing keys gpg: key 019A7474297D8577: "Daniel Bermond" not changed gpg: Total number processed: 1 gpg: unchanged: 1

dbermond commented on 2019-06-02 15:34

@shulamy Before building the package, you need to import the pgp key by doing:

$ gpg --recv-keys 019A7474297D8577!

shulamy commented on 2019-06-02 14:32

pkgcacheclean-1.9.0.tar.gz ... FAILED (unknown public key 019A7474297D8577) ==> ERROR: One or more PGP signatures could not be verified!

dbermond commented on 2017-09-07 12:24

@grimsock Thank you.

grimsock commented on 2017-09-07 12:16

@dbermond Just fixed it ;)

dbermond commented on 2017-09-07 11:53

@grimsock Error when building the newly released version 1.9.0-1:
==> Retrieving sources...
-> Found pkgcacheclean.c
-> Found pkgcacheclean.8
==> Validating source files with md5sums...
pkgcacheclean.c ... FAILED
pkgcacheclean.8 ... Passed
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

grimsock commented on 2017-09-07 11:43

@kd35a Done. Thanks!