Package Details: polymc-git 6.0.r16.g62fd3d43-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: polymc-git
Description: Minecraft launcher with the ability to manage multiple instances.
Upstream URL:
Licenses: GPL3
Conflicts: polymc
Provides: polymc
Submitter: lovetocode999
Maintainer: LennyLennington (Kaydax, sperg512)
Last Packager: Kaydax
Votes: 12
Popularity: 0.000023
First Submitted: 2021-12-28 00:24 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-06-06 20:58 (UTC)

Dependencies (21)

Required by (1)

Sources (2)

Pinned Comments

Scrumplex commented on 2022-07-11 08:09 (UTC) (edited on 2022-07-11 08:10 (UTC) by Scrumplex)

This package has now switched to Qt 6 instead of Qt 5. If you want to keep using Qt 5 instead, then please switch to polymc-qt5-git.

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 Next › Last »

LennyLennington commented on 2024-06-04 14:59 (UTC)

@Reden pkgver value in VCS packages doesn't reflect the actual version you get, because the PKGBUILD will grab the latest version available regardless of the initial version it was last packaged for.

Note: VCS packages are not considered out of date when the pkgver changes; do not flag them as the maintainer will merely unflag the package and ignore you. AUR maintainers should not commit mere pkgver bumps.

Reden commented on 2024-05-31 16:13 (UTC)

polymc-bin is at 6.1, while this is 5.0... hmmmm

Jackleson commented on 2023-05-26 03:55 (UTC) (edited on 2023-06-01 18:53 (UTC) by Jackleson)

warning: [options] bootstrap class path not set in conjunction with -source 7
error: Source option 7 is no longer supported. Use 8 or later.
error: Target option 7 is no longer supported. Use 8 or later.
warning: [options] bootstrap class path not set in conjunction with -source 7
error: Source option 7 is no longer supported. Use 8 or later.
error: Target option 7 is no longer supported. Use 8 or later.
make[2]: *** [libraries/launcher/CMakeFiles/NewLaunch.dir/build.make:93: libraries/launcher/CMakeFiles/NewLaunch.dir/java_compiled_NewLaunch] Error 2
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:1382: libraries/launcher/CMakeFiles/NewLaunch.dir/all] Error 2
make[1]: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs....
make[2]: *** [libraries/javacheck/CMakeFiles/JavaCheck.dir/build.make:84: libraries/javacheck/CMakeFiles/JavaCheck.dir/java_compiled_JavaCheck] Error 2
make[1]: *** [CMakeFiles/Makefile2:1408: libraries/javacheck/CMakeFiles/JavaCheck.dir/all] Error 2
make: *** [Makefile:146: all] Error 2
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in build().

I think I have too new of java installed or something. not sure.

edit: I ran it yesterday and it installed fine. didn't mess with java so idk.

<deleted-account> commented on 2022-11-10 19:07 (UTC)

@sperg512 thanks. I had jdk17-openjdk installed which still threw the error. removing it and using 8 worked perfectly.

sperg512 commented on 2022-11-10 02:58 (UTC)

@gshinguji You need to install jdk8-openjdk. The JDK is for compilation, the JRE is for running stuff

<deleted-account> commented on 2022-11-10 02:44 (UTC)

receiving error trying to upgrade (paru):

CMake Error at libraries/launcher/CMakeLists.txt:2 (project):
  No CMAKE_Java_COMPILER could be found.

  Tell CMake where to find the compiler by setting either the environment
  variable "JAVA_COMPILER" or the CMake cache entry CMAKE_Java_COMPILER to
  the full path to the compiler, or to the compiler name if it is in the

anyone know what this might be? I have jre-openjdk(-headless) and jre8-openjdk(-headless) installed. I tried jre17 as well to no avail.

Kaydax commented on 2022-11-02 21:54 (UTC)

@Cryen I just fixed that issue in the latest update, it should work now

Cryen commented on 2022-10-30 23:18 (UTC)

Cloning into '/home/cryen/.cache/paru/clone/polymc-git/src/PolyMC/libraries/libnbtplusplus'...
fatal: transport 'file' not allowed
fatal: clone of '/home/cryen/.cache/paru/clone/polymc-git/src/libnbtplusplus' into submodule path '/home/cryen/.cache/paru/clone/polymc-git/src/PolyMC/libraries/libnbtplusplus' failed
Failed to clone 'libraries/libnbtplusplus' a second time, aborting
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in prepare().

I can't seem to find a solution for this issue

hockeymikey commented on 2022-10-21 14:13 (UTC)

@haxie Not the place but yet here you are replying and trying to claim authority. I provided plenty of justification, one should/could glance over my comments and see. You're just trying to get the last word in and take the high road, not civilly end this discussion. I guess I will, everyone can research the facts over the situation and make a judgment call for themselves and what project to use, as FOSS should be able, freedom and choice.