Package Details: powershell-git 6.0.0.rc.5.gcc24b88a1-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/powershell-git.git (read-only)
Package Base: powershell-git
Description: A cross-platform automation and configuration tool/framework (git version)
Upstream URL: https://github.com/PowerShell/PowerShell
Keywords: microsoft powershell shell
Licenses: MIT
Conflicts: powershell
Provides: powershell
Submitter: sergio.correia
Maintainer: kylesferrazza
Last Packager: kylesferrazza
Votes: 20
Popularity: 0.840825
First Submitted: 2016-08-21 20:35
Last Updated: 2017-11-21 00:10

Dependencies (4)

Required by (0)

Sources (4)

Pinned Comments

kylesferrazza commented on 2017-10-26 17:49

Note that the binary is now called "pwsh"

Latest Comments

kylesferrazza commented on 2017-10-26 17:49

Note that the binary is now called "pwsh"

kylesferrazza commented on 2017-10-23 17:26

Thanks for reporting the error, @iconfly. It seems they've renamed the binary "pwsh", the package has been updated accordingly.

iconfly commented on 2017-10-21 16:46

Starting Package()...
chmod: cannot access '/tmp/yaourt-tmp-iconfly/aur-powershell-git/pkg/powershell-git/usr/lib/powershell/linux-x64/powershell': No such file or directory
==> ERROR: A failure occurred in package().
Aborting...
==> ERROR: Makepkg was unable to build powershell-git.
==> Restart building powershell-git ? [y/N]

drizzt396 commented on 2017-09-27 03:21

Can confirm, thanks @kylesferrazza!

Also, +1 for letting me be lazy and ignore this until one day it decided to compile.

kylesferrazza commented on 2017-04-29 13:27

Fixed and updated to work with dotnet 2.0!

the_lf commented on 2017-04-10 01:59

Also can confirm @drizzt396's issues. 3000+ errors.

the_lf commented on 2017-04-10 01:57

This actually depends on dotnet-sdk, which isn't listed in the pkgbuild.

drizzt396 commented on 2017-03-29 11:54

Holy shit, the makepkg used fail gracefully on one of my machines (compiles fine on my other box), and now it just vomits errors (3764 before I managed to interrupt). What happened?

jsteel commented on 2017-02-16 08:26

Ignore my last comment; I think for this package I didn't chroot as it gave me an issue, so yes I see those files in my home (not part of the package but they are created).

jsteel commented on 2017-02-16 08:17

I hadn't noticed as I build in a chroot. I'll take a look but in the meantime any suggestions welcome.

All comments