Search Criteria
Package Details: protonmail-bridge-nokeychain 3.23.1-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/protonmail-bridge-nokeychain.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | protonmail-bridge-nokeychain |
| Description: | An IMAP/SMTP bridge to a ProtonMail account (patched, stores secrets in a file) |
| Upstream URL: | https://protonmail.com/bridge/ |
| Licenses: | GPL3 |
| Conflicts: | protonmail-bridge, protonmail-bridge-core |
| Provides: | protonmail-bridge |
| Submitter: | andrei.dubovik |
| Maintainer: | andrei.dubovik |
| Last Packager: | andrei.dubovik |
| Votes: | 3 |
| Popularity: | 0.000001 |
| First Submitted: | 2021-05-27 16:36 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2026-03-15 08:55 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
- libfido2 (libfido2-fullAUR)
- go (go-gitAUR, gcc-go-gitAUR, goup-rsAUR, gcc-go-snapshotAUR, go-binAUR, gcc-go) (make)
Required by (2)
- mutt-wizard (requires protonmail-bridge) (optional)
- mutt-wizard-git (requires protonmail-bridge) (optional)
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
andrei.dubovik commented on 2026-02-14 14:23 (UTC)
@system7 Thank you for reporting that error. I've added libfido2 to the runtime dependencies.
system7 commented on 2026-02-12 06:15 (UTC) (edited on 2026-02-12 06:17 (UTC) by system7)
I have an error. I cannot figure out what is the problem with it
EDIT: Lol, after I wrote this, I saw the error: missing
libfido2package. So,$ yay -S libfido2and after that, it worked seamlessly.andrei.dubovik commented on 2026-02-11 19:39 (UTC)
According to the wiki, https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#makedepends,
base-develis assumed to be already installed and its dependencies should not be listed in makedepends.patchandmakeare both dependencies of base-devel.james7132 commented on 2026-02-04 04:09 (UTC)
This has an unstated make dependency on
patchandmake. It should probably be included in the dependencies.andrei.dubovik commented on 2024-10-14 19:43 (UTC)
@cyclic3 Updated the package metadata, thanks for the heads up.
cyclic3 commented on 2024-10-13 23:47 (UTC)
Just a heads up: this package also conflicts with
protonmail-bridge-core, could that be added to the PKGBUILD?DrosteEffect commented on 2024-01-27 15:07 (UTC)
@andrei.dubovik Great, thanks!
andrei.dubovik commented on 2024-01-22 15:27 (UTC)
@DrosteEffect Yes, I'll try to allocate some time to update the package this week. Sorry for a long delay.
In general, maybe my two cents on security and why I bothered in the first place to make this package, and why I think it is perfectly reasonable to store "secrets" in a cleartext file. Adding additional security layers on top of what an OS already provides adds extra complexity and possibly extra vulnerabilities while not actually giving any extra security under the scenario that the OS itself is compromised. SSH stores its secrets in plain text, for instance. Then again, if your keychain requires a yubikey to open or a similar authorization solution, then I would agree that using the keychain provides better security. I just don't think it's correct to say the official package is strictly more secure under all typical usage scenarios.
MarsSeed commented on 2024-01-22 14:53 (UTC) (edited on 2024-01-22 14:56 (UTC) by MarsSeed)
@DrosteEffect, it seems at this point it is best if you migrated to the up-to-date protonmail-bridge-core.
It serves the same use case, but in a secure way (unlike this package that stores "secrets" in a cleartext file.)
Edit: changed the link to protonmail-bridge-core, because that is the successor of protonmail-bridge-nogui (and the latter is pending deletion as of now).
DrosteEffect commented on 2024-01-22 11:59 (UTC)
Will this package be updated soon? It's been out of date since July 2023.
1 2 Next › Last »