Package Details: pulse-secure 22.7r3.0_b30227-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/pulse-secure.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: pulse-secure
Description: Ivanti Secure Access Client
Upstream URL: https://www.pulsesecure.net/
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: pulse-connect-secure
Submitter: yan12125
Maintainer: chiwanpark
Last Packager: chiwanpark
Votes: 34
Popularity: 0.098188
First Submitted: 2017-09-02 07:40 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-10-10 14:26 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

chiwanpark commented on 2021-02-24 10:21 (UTC)

If you want to use old pulse-secure client 9.1r9, please download the following package.

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_8tRA-T9vV08n_TpHqdcG5IvalxBuZ7_/view?usp=sharing

The rewritten pulse-secure client requires a service called 'pulsesecure'. Please enable and start the service before running the client.

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Next › Last »

yan12125 commented on 2017-10-24 10:20 (UTC)

@jsimonetti: Could you run `sudo strace -fp <pid of pulsesvc> |& grep /usr/local/pulse` to see which path is it accessing? I may reconsider putting things back to /usr/local/pulse. See also https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2017-August/033451.html for previous discussions. @rudepeople: that message is less than informative. Only Pulse Secure staff can fix it - nobody else has pulseUi.cpp.

jsimonetti commented on 2017-10-24 10:00 (UTC)

For some reason, this package only works if I also add a symlink from /usr/local/pulse -> /opt/pulsesecure/ Our company uses a hostchecker (which doesn't do anything for linux platform, but still runs). Without this symlink, the log is spammed with errors such as: pulseui.error Failed to read return cookie from host checker process (pulseUi.cpp:948) pulseui.error initiatePreAuthHostCheck() failed, isPostAuth: 1 (pulseUi.cpp:1055) So somewhere in the pulseUi code there appears to be a hardcoded path to /usr/local/pulse ;(

rudepeople commented on 2017-10-24 05:18 (UTC) (edited on 2017-10-24 05:21 (UTC) by rudepeople)

@yan12125: Yep, I'm already using networkmanager, and before you responded, I went ahead and installed gnome... same issue. On your suggestion, I ran: $tail -f ~/.pulse_secure/pulse/pulsesvc.log every time I click "submit" (within pulseUi) I get something like this: 20171023224951.187212 pulsesvc[p2864.t2864] pulseui.error (pulseUi.cpp:265) I'm seeing it every time I hit "submit". I tried googleing it, but I'm not seeing that specific error anywhere else (the search was only 2 pages deep so... gotta check 'em all!), and I cant seem to get to kb.pulsesecure.net to search for the error specifically. I get a DNS error when I try. Any help would be greatly appreciated! Before anyone suggests network issues, my ISP is a "last mile" provider. their network is secure as FSCK, but it's also completely transparent, lacking all the traffic shaping BS of large providers. Also, this all works fine in... *sigh* ...windows.

yan12125 commented on 2017-10-24 04:45 (UTC)

@rudepeople: This is DE-independent. I use this fine with LXQt. I indeed got some issue with connman. Its routing table strategy conflicts with pulse-secure, so I switched to NetworkManager. BTW, I found that after checking ~/.pulse_secure/pulse/pulsesvc.log.

rudepeople commented on 2017-10-24 03:19 (UTC)

do I have to have gnome installed for this to work? when I open pulseUi and add my company connection, I get the user-name field, but clicking submit yields no response... I'm attempting to run this in KDE.

yan12125 commented on 2017-10-23 17:08 (UTC)

Yes, you need the 64-bit version for the new version. BTW, I hope this can implemented: https://github.com/yan12125/aur/issues/7. Help wanted :)

codedmart commented on 2017-10-23 16:54 (UTC)

Nevermind I see what happened.

codedmart commented on 2017-10-23 16:48 (UTC)

@yan12125 I am seeing this error now after upgrading: `/opt/pulsesecure/pulseUi: error while loading shared libraries: libwebkitgtk-3.0.so.0: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory`

yan12125 commented on 2017-10-22 15:39 (UTC)

I bet you're right. It's stated in their release notes. Updated and thanks!

<deleted-account> commented on 2017-10-22 15:14 (UTC)

@yan12125: I only received links for the 5.3r3.0 64-bit installers unfortunately. Maybe they dropped support for 32-bit starting with the 5.3r3.0 release?

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Next › Last »