Search Criteria
Package Details: pycharm-community-jre 2024.2.3-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/pycharm-community-jre.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | pycharm-community-jre |
Description: | PyCharm Community Edition IDE for Python with bundled JRE |
Upstream URL: | https://www.jetbrains.com/pycharm/ |
Keywords: | development editor ide jetbrains python |
Licenses: | Apache-2.0 |
Conflicts: | pycharm-community-eap, pycharm-community-edition |
Submitter: | PMay |
Maintainer: | bulletmark |
Last Packager: | bulletmark |
Votes: | 21 |
Popularity: | 0.77 |
First Submitted: | 2020-03-14 20:05 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-10-10 10:21 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3
PMay commented on 2021-09-26 13:24 (UTC)
@cgarz: Thanks for reportig. Where and when exactly does it complain? At startup? I do not see the error on my side.
cgarz commented on 2021-09-25 19:01 (UTC) (edited on 2021-09-25 19:12 (UTC) by cgarz)
After updating it now complains about fsnotifier being missing.
It seems fsnotifier is now only 64bit and no longer has the bit width suffix. So the PKGBUILD is now removing the 64 bit version.
For now changing this in the PKGBUILD before installing works:
rm -rf bin/fsnotifier{,-arm}
to:
rm -rf bin/fsnotifier-arm
hertog commented on 2020-11-26 22:37 (UTC)
2020.2.4 has just been released: https://confluence.jetbrains.com/display/PYH/PyCharm+2020.2.4+Release+Notes and https://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm/2020/11/pycharm-2020-2-4-is-out/
hertog commented on 2020-11-26 22:37 (UTC)
2020.2.4 has just been released: https://confluence.jetbrains.com/display/PYH/PyCharm+2020.2.4+Release+Notes and https://blog.jetbrains.com/pycharm/2020/11/pycharm-2020-2-4-is-out/
PMay commented on 2020-07-08 20:30 (UTC) (edited on 2020-07-14 19:56 (UTC) by PMay)
@spayder26 Yes you are right. I fixed it in a new package version. Thanks for the hint. Maybe you could review it again?
ergoithz commented on 2020-07-06 08:54 (UTC)
Looking at both the launch script, and to what pycharm itself complains about, it seems this is, in fact, not using any bundled jre.
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3