Arch Linux User Repository

Thanks for the update. Could we switch to python3 here? Seems like it's supported: "pyReScene requires Python 2.6, 2.7, or 3 to run"

2002-12-19 Has the same issue. Can anything be done to remedy this? Also, it is strange that the script does not start with the newest version - it starts with 2009-12-12 and then works it way through the older versions, meaning it never gets to the newer versions as the script crashes when it fails to execute a rar version. Ideally the script would start with the newest version, and skip the version with problems gracefully. But that is, perhaps, a bug to be filed with pyrescene and not here. Output when failing: Fatal error: glibc detected an invalid stdio handle Fatal error: glibc detected an invalid stdio handle Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rescene/srr.py", line 602, in main parser.exit(manage_srr(options, infolder, infiles, working_dir)) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rescene/srr.py", line 316, in manage_srr options.volume is None, options.volume, rar_mt) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rescene/main.py", line 1318, in reconstruct in_folder, hints, auto_locate_renamed) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rescene/main.py", line 1707, in get_rar_data_object auto_locate_renamed)) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rescene/main.py", line 2019, in compressed_rar_file_factory nblock, followup_src, solid=False) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rescene/main.py", line 2144, in __init__ first_block, blocks, thread_count) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rescene/main.py", line 2396, in search_matching_rar_executable found = try_rar_executable(rar, args, old) File "/usr/lib/python2.7/site-packages/rescene/main.py", line 2316, in try_rar_executable _fire(MsgCode.MSG, message=RETURNCODE[compress.returncode]) KeyError: -6 Unexpected Error: -6Trying 2002-12-19 3.10. Something went wrong executing Rar.exe:

Addition: 2003-01-15_rar311 misses libstdc++-libc6.2-2.so.3

For once, 1997-12-29_rar202 and 1999-03-24_rar250 are missing executable rights. Also 1997-12-29_rar202 didn't work for me, at first it is missing its interpreter ld-linux.so.1 and even when you dirty link that to ld-linux.so.2 it's missing libc.so.5. I tried linking that to libc.so.6 but it keeps complaining about missing libc.so.5.