Package Details: pyspread 1.99.5-2

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: pyspread
Description: Python based non-traditional spreadsheet application
Upstream URL:
Licenses: GPL3
Submitter: None
Maintainer: Jake
Last Packager: Jake
Votes: 11
Popularity: 0.144161
First Submitted: 2010-11-09 14:49
Last Updated: 2020-11-24 14:21

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »

manns commented on 2020-11-26 19:01

@Jake: Thank you for pointing out. I have just updated the upstream master branch.

Jake commented on 2020-11-24 21:54

@manns: Oh I have just realized that they named it python-dateutil on PyPI, not dateutil like everywhere else, that is strange: Sorry for causing the confusion, dateutil does not actually exist there so it throws an error now, please fix it.

manns commented on 2020-11-24 21:10

@Jake: Thank you for pointing this out. I have added the dateutil dependency to both files in the upstream master branch.

Jake commented on 2020-11-24 14:23

@hilton: Correct, thanks for the notice, I have added it now. The optional matplotlib pulls it also as dependency, so it was working with that installed. @manns If you read this by any chance here, dateutil should be added upstream in requires and requirements.txt as well.

hilton commented on 2020-11-24 12:54

Hello, thanks for the package! It is missing a python-dateutil dependency.

Jake commented on 2020-10-10 10:44

@manns: Could be local leftover files, that are used instead of fresh download? That can cause such issues if the hash changes, but the filename stays the same, like a few weeks ago.

manns commented on 2020-10-09 22:33

@Jake: Strange, on my other system, it installs all right. Therefore, it may be an issue with my installation. I will look into this next week.

Jake commented on 2020-10-09 08:26

@manns: I can't reproduce this, what checksum do you get instead?

manns commented on 2020-10-09 07:25

Now the build fails because of a checksum error. Could you please fix this?

Jake commented on 2020-09-28 09:29

Thanks @manns for clarification. That's fine, I am just curious if such things happen. Btw: the archive that we download here does not contain any git information (commit hashes, branches, etc) and is just pure source code, the checksum is calculated over the tar.gz. Could be because of different timestamps (ctime/mtime) directly on the files though.