Package Details: python-apt 3.0.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/python-apt.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: python-apt
Description: Python interface to libapt-pkg
Upstream URL: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/python-apt
Keywords: apt debian python
Licenses: GPL-2.0-or-later
Submitter: JonnyJD
Maintainer: micwoj92
Last Packager: micwoj92
Votes: 12
Popularity: 0.001308
First Submitted: 2014-06-11 08:37 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2025-06-19 17:57 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »

micwoj92 commented on 2025-03-17 21:33 (UTC)

Updated.

micwoj92 commented on 2025-03-12 20:27 (UTC)

I'll get to this soon

a821 commented on 2025-03-12 17:23 (UTC) (edited on 2025-03-18 08:03 (UTC) by a821)

Edit: fixed. thx!

This is not an architecture independent package, so arch should be x86_64. Also, consider updating to build process to PEP-517, also the license SPDX identifier (GPL-2.0-or-later).

yochananmarqos commented on 2023-12-13 17:30 (UTC)

@truocolo: I understand about dealing with IRL issue. No worries.

truocolo commented on 2023-12-13 17:02 (UTC) (edited on 2023-12-13 17:04 (UTC) by truocolo)

@yochananmarqos:

Yes, I had some heavy irl issues, I'm just now coming back to a computing platform. I haven't been able to access almost nothing for almost 6 months.

Watching the out-of-dates pile up, progressively losing maintainerships and seeing people getting mad without being able to do anything has very much felt like being eaten alive.

I am updating everything that has piled up as fast as I can, please don't get mad if it will take just a little more than it always has been, it's not exactly easy working as I am.

yochananmarqos commented on 2023-12-13 16:47 (UTC)

@truocolo: I noticed because there were new tags in the repo today (though 2.6.0 is still the stable version). I realized I had forgotten to answer your question here and noticed the package was still flagged out of date since August. I see you have 62 other packages that are flagged out of date as well...

truocolo commented on 2023-12-13 16:38 (UTC) (edited on 2023-12-13 16:43 (UTC) by truocolo)

@yochananmarqos:

it does feel so weird to get all these 'if you are not going to maintain it, orphan it' messages as of lately, as if I hadn't maintained this and other packages for years.

Do you want to co-maintain it?

Please don't take it personally but it does feel even weirder because of how nobody have seemed to notice I have disappeared for like six months or so.

The general vibe is like if I had died I would have kept receiving ever more harsh messages over time.

yochananmarqos commented on 2023-12-13 16:13 (UTC)

@tallero: Yes. See https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/PKGBUILD#arch

If you're not going to maintain this, please orphan it.

tallero commented on 2021-07-23 15:04 (UTC)

@yochananmarqos it works at least on a dozen architectures. do you want me to write them all?

yochananmarqos commented on 2021-07-04 22:25 (UTC)

@tallero: The 2.1.3 tag no longer exists and 2.2.1 was just released. Are you planning on maintaining this or not?

1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »