Search Criteria
Package Details: python-birdseye 0.9.4-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/python-birdseye.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | python-birdseye |
| Description: | Graphical Python debugger which lets you view the values of all evaluated expressions |
| Upstream URL: | https://github.com/alexmojaki/birdseye |
| Licenses: | MIT |
| Submitter: | jose1711 |
| Maintainer: | jose1711 (djmattyg007, carlosal1015) |
| Last Packager: | carlosal1015 |
| Votes: | 1 |
| Popularity: | 0.000228 |
| First Submitted: | 2021-01-02 15:00 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2022-08-16 22:51 (UTC) |
Dependencies (15)
- python-asttokens
- python-cached-property
- python-cheap_repr
- python-flask-humanize
- python-littleutils
- python-outdated
- python-sqlalchemy (python-sqlalchemy-git, python-sqlalchemy1.3)
- python-setuptools-scm (make)
- python-wheel (make)
- python-beautifulsoup4 (check)
- python-flask (python-flask-git, python-flask1) (check)
- python-markupsafe (check)
- python-pandas (check)
- python-pytest (check)
- python-selenium (check)
Required by (1)
- thonny (optional)
Latest Comments
djmattyg007 commented on 2021-08-17 03:11 (UTC)
@jose1711 Thanks for adding me as a co-maintainer. I'll look to make the necessary updates this weekend :)
djmattyg007 commented on 2021-05-05 02:17 (UTC)
I still can't build this in a clean chroot. It appears there are missing makedeps on
python-wheelandpython-setuptools-scm:https://github.com/alexmojaki/birdseye/blob/master/setup.cfg#L38
The latest update won't build properly even if those dependencies are fulfilled, because of a reference to an undefined variable
${birdseye}in the last line of thepackage()function.djmattyg007 commented on 2021-04-24 05:49 (UTC)
Also the license file likely doesn't get added to /usr/share/licenses when installing from the wheel like this. I highly recommend just using the tarball.
djmattyg007 commented on 2021-04-24 04:58 (UTC)
This fails to build because pip isn't listed as a make dependency.
Wouldn't it be preferable to just use the tarball like was used previously? It removes the dependency on pip and allows any platform-specific optimisations to be applied at build time.
djmattyg007 commented on 2021-03-23 08:58 (UTC)
The license file should be included in PyPI packages moving forward.
djmattyg007 commented on 2021-01-04 00:21 (UTC)
I've filed an issue upstream to get the LICENSE file included in the PyPI package so that you don't need to store a copy of the license in this repository:
https://github.com/alexmojaki/birdseye/issues/86
That said, it would be preferable if you could download the LICENSE file directly from github rather than include it in the repository.
djmattyg007 commented on 2021-01-03 05:28 (UTC)
Could you please install the LICENSE file into /usr/share/licenses?