Search Criteria
Package Details: python-flatbuffers-git 1:2.0.6.r130.g6e279164-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/flatbuffers-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | flatbuffers-git |
Description: | An efficient cross platform serialization library for Python |
Upstream URL: | https://google.github.io/flatbuffers/ |
Licenses: | Apache |
Conflicts: | python-flatbuffers |
Provides: | python-flatbuffers |
Submitter: | m3rcuriel |
Maintainer: | xiretza |
Last Packager: | xiretza |
Votes: | 0 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2020-02-05 16:02 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2022-07-31 15:45 (UTC) |
Dependencies (4)
Required by (11)
- python-crossbar (requires python-flatbuffers)
- python-jax-rocm (requires python-flatbuffers)
- python-jaxlib (requires python-flatbuffers)
- python-jaxlib-bin (requires python-flatbuffers)
- python-jaxlib-cuda (requires python-flatbuffers)
- python-mediapipe (requires python-flatbuffers)
- python-mediapipe-git (requires python-flatbuffers)
- python-tensorflow-opt-rocm (requires python-flatbuffers)
- python-tensorflow-rocm (requires python-flatbuffers)
- python-tf2onnx (requires python-flatbuffers)
- python-tflite (requires python-flatbuffers)
Latest Comments
xiretza commented on 2022-06-15 13:57 (UTC)
epoch=
, the new pkgver scheme is not compatible with the old one.-DCMAKE_BUILD_TYPE=Release
, see the CMake package guidelines: https://wiki.archlinux.org/title/CMake_package_guidelines#Notes_about_-O3xiretza commented on 2022-06-03 11:14 (UTC)
Hi! Please bump
epoch=
, the new pkgver scheme is not compatible with the old one.xiretza commented on 2022-05-20 18:01 (UTC)
Hi, here are a couple patches to fix dependencies, pkgver() and arch=:
kzd commented on 2022-02-23 06:25 (UTC)
Oddly, this package is failing for me in the build() phase with a bunch of
VerifyField
errors that want 3 arguments. Building the source repo separately with the same commands seems to work however. Installing the package after having done the successful build worked thereafter but of course this doesn't seem intentional.