Search Criteria
Package Details: python-lsp-ruff 2.3.0-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/python-lsp-ruff.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | python-lsp-ruff |
| Description: | python-lsp-server plugin for extensive and fast linting using ruff |
| Upstream URL: | https://github.com/python-lsp/python-lsp-ruff |
| Licenses: | MIT |
| Submitter: | jhossbach |
| Maintainer: | jhossbach |
| Last Packager: | jhossbach |
| Votes: | 13 |
| Popularity: | 0.26 |
| First Submitted: | 2022-12-13 22:05 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2025-09-30 08:28 (UTC) |
Dependencies (10)
- python-cattrs
- python-lsp-server
- python-lsprotocol
- python-ruff
- python-tomli
- python-build (make)
- python-installer (make)
- python-setuptools (make)
- python-wheel (make)
- python-pytest (check)
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
micwoj92 commented on 2025-02-13 10:51 (UTC)
Please install license file.
ginnokami commented on 2024-09-27 12:30 (UTC)
Could you please add
python-setuptoolsto the make depends, as it is needed for building in a chroot environment. Without this make dependency you will get the following error when building:jhossbach commented on 2023-05-31 16:10 (UTC)
This looks like https://github.com/python-lsp/python-lsp-ruff/issues/39, which was resolved after upgrading ruff to
>=v0.0.267. The upgrade is not done automatically becauseruffcomes from the arch repos in this case? I am unsure if dependency specification is even possible in this case. But upgrading to ruff >= 0.0.267 should solve the issue.harshcurious commented on 2023-05-31 15:47 (UTC)
This failed tests for me. Full log here: https://pastebin.com/1G5jfpgR
jhossbach commented on 2023-02-28 12:13 (UTC)
@alerque Great, thanks alot! Updated to use python-ruff instead of ruff.
alerque commented on 2023-02-28 11:37 (UTC)
@jhossbach The Python module is just a thin wrapper around the binary executable. It uses
os.spawnv()to run the CLI it with your options and pass results back to Python.jhossbach commented on 2023-02-25 21:04 (UTC)
@alerque I can confirm it working with
python-ruff. Why do you needruffas a dependency ofpython-ruff?alerque commented on 2023-02-25 17:07 (UTC) (edited on 2023-02-25 17:07 (UTC) by alerque)
Per FS#77637 this package probably needs to depend on
python-ruff, currently in [community-testing]. I would appreciate if somebody who uses this and had/has it working already can give it a spin with the new split ruff packaging:rharish commented on 2023-01-15 11:23 (UTC)
@TomFryers Thanks! That worked for me.
TomFryers commented on 2023-01-15 11:19 (UTC)
I had the same issue. It seems to work if you uninstall the old version first.
1 2 Next › Last »