Search Criteria
Package Details: python-pydeprecate 0.3.2-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/python-pydeprecate.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | python-pydeprecate |
Description: | Python module for deprecation documentation |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/Borda/pyDeprecate |
Licenses: | BSD |
Conflicts: | python-pydeprecate |
Provides: | python-pydeprecate |
Submitter: | 7Z0nE |
Maintainer: | 7Z0nE |
Last Packager: | 7Z0nE |
Votes: | 1 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2021-05-10 10:36 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2021-09-08 06:53 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
- python (python37AUR, python311AUR, python310AUR)
- python-setuptools (make)
Latest Comments
ChrisMorgan commented on 2022-09-05 15:44 (UTC)
Minor packaging error: /usr/share/license should be /usr/share/licenses.
hottea commented on 2021-09-08 13:56 (UTC)
@7Z0nE Maybe you could follow this PKGBUILD. There are issues in the current PKGBUILD in AUR: 1. a pkg should not provides itself and conflicts itself. 2. BSD license is not listed in licenses, so we need to install the LICENSE file. 3. run
updpkgsums
to update src tarball checksum instead of marking it asSKIP
7Z0nE commented on 2021-09-08 06:51 (UTC)
@trougnouf appearently makepkg downloads the sources before updating the pkgver. A work around can be to just run makepkg twice. First updating the version in the PKGBUILD secondly installing the most recent version. However, I removed the pkgver() and updated the static version.
hottea commented on 2021-09-03 09:27 (UTC)
@trougnouf try this PKGBUILD.
trougnouf commented on 2021-09-03 09:22 (UTC) (edited on 2021-09-03 09:27 (UTC) by trougnouf)
Installation fails, I assume because the PKGBUILD tries to update pkgver which may not be possible ? Changing the version manually works.
Running twice also works, but since you need to run this anyway to update, you might as well add the checksum and run updpkgsums.
7Z0nE commented on 2021-05-17 06:11 (UTC)
@hottea Thanks for pointing out! Can I put 'BSD3' as argument to license? Or does the PKGBUILD only support 'BSD'?
hottea commented on 2021-05-15 15:13 (UTC)
The license is BSD not MIT.