Search Criteria
Package Details: python-pytest-recording 0.13.4-3
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/python-pytest-recording.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | python-pytest-recording |
| Description: | Pytest plugin to record network interactions with VCR.py |
| Upstream URL: | https://pypi.org/project/pytest_recording |
| Licenses: | MIT |
| Submitter: | AchmadFathoni |
| Maintainer: | gesh |
| Last Packager: | gesh |
| Votes: | 1 |
| Popularity: | 0.000682 |
| First Submitted: | 2022-03-22 09:59 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2026-02-13 14:48 (UTC) |
Dependencies (12)
- python
- python-pytest
- python-vcrpy (python-vcrpy-gitAUR)
- python-build (make)
- python-hatchling (python-hatchling-gitAUR) (make)
- python-installer (make)
- python-pytest (check)
- python-pytest-httpbin (check)
- python-pytest-mock (check)
- python-requests (check)
- python-werkzeug (check)
- python-pycurl (optional) – Block pycurl-based network connections
Required by (15)
- python-clai (check)
- python-genai-prices (check)
- python-habanero (check)
- python-llm-anthropic (check)
- python-llm-gemini (check)
- python-llm-mistral (check)
- python-llm-ollama (check)
- python-llm-openrouter (check)
- python-logfire (check)
- python-pydantic-ai (check)
- python-pydantic-ai-examples (check)
- python-pydantic-ai-slim (check)
- python-pydantic-evals (check)
- python-pydantic-graph (check)
- python-replicate-git (check)
Latest Comments
1 2 3 Next › Last »
marmis commented on 2026-02-22 22:55 (UTC)
Build and tests are fine for me on clean chroot.
medaminezghal commented on 2026-02-19 18:22 (UTC)
@gesh For me it still doesn't work. The only working release is the first one. I'm not understand why you update it if it works in clean chroot?
This is an example in failed test:
gesh commented on 2026-02-13 14:39 (UTC) (edited on 2026-02-13 14:45 (UTC) by gesh)
@medaminezhgal Your PKGBUILD changes so much, it is difficult to see what exactly it's doing. I'm going through it, but don't have much time today.
Also, I don't see what it's fixing? The package builds fine in a clean chroot.
Also also, it does not follow the guidelines, as it violates RFC0020 which recommends package sources avoid PyPI since sdists aren't always suitable for packaging and stable URLs aren't always visible. It also doesn't install the package to a venv for testing (which is needed for the tests to succeed).
Also, the choice of
--disable-warningsis odd to me -- why would you hide this information from users?However, this did show me I forgot to remove
python-coveragefrom thecheckdepends, thanks for that. Other than that, I'm not merging any of the changes in, though.medaminezghal commented on 2026-02-13 09:20 (UTC)
@gesh This is a PKGBUILD file that is compatible with
Python package Guidelinesand working fine:The first package release was working fine for me but the new one doesn't work anymore.
gesh commented on 2025-04-21 18:11 (UTC)
Odd, I can reproduce the issue but can't figure out why it ever worked. Thanks for flagging and fixing this!
Drack commented on 2025-04-18 23:18 (UTC)
Hello, following my previous comment, here is a patch to the
PKGBUILDthat fix the issue with the bad directory name:Drack commented on 2025-04-11 07:17 (UTC)
Hello,
When trying to update this package as of today, I got the following error:
gesh commented on 2025-04-10 12:43 (UTC)
@medaminezghal I saw it, but thanks for keeping me posted on it. I've updated
prepare()to use the final PR you posted for clarity's sake.medaminezghal commented on 2025-04-10 09:57 (UTC)
@gesh In the next version there is no need to use the prepare function as the problem is fixed from the PR in the GitHub and it has merged today.
gesh commented on 2025-04-04 15:15 (UTC)
Right - I ended up using your
sedsolution instead of just patching using your PR as I initially intended - upstream has diverged too far since the last release for the patch to cover all the invocations it needs to.1 2 3 Next › Last »