Hi @nozonyan, python-sbvirtualdisplay is not packaged in AUR yet.
Search Criteria
Package Details: python-seleniumbase 4.32.6-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/python-seleniumbase.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | python-seleniumbase |
| Description: | A complete web automation framework for end-to-end testing |
| Upstream URL: | https://seleniumbase.io |
| Licenses: | MIT |
| Submitter: | carlosal1015 |
| Maintainer: | carlosal1015 |
| Last Packager: | carlosal1015 |
| Votes: | 1 |
| Popularity: | 0.000215 |
| First Submitted: | 2023-06-27 16:53 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-11-02 15:15 (UTC) |
Dependencies (30)
- python-beautifulsoup4
- python-behaveAUR
- python-charset-normalizer
- python-colorama (python-colorama-gitAUR)
- python-cssselect
- python-execnet
- python-fasteners (python-fasteners-gitAUR)
- python-filelock
- python-markdown-it-py
- python-mdurl
- python-parameterized
- python-parse-type
- python-pdbpAUR
- python-platformdirs
- python-pyotp
- python-pytest-htmlAUR
- python-requests
- python-rich
- python-seleniumAUR
- python-sortedcontainers
- Show 10 more dependencies...
Required by (2)
- python-trame-client (check)
- python-trame-vtk (check)
Sources (1)
Latest Comments
carlosal1015 commented on 2024-09-14 17:08 (UTC)
nozonyan commented on 2024-09-14 07:04 (UTC)
is there a reason why you left out sbvirtualdisplay? I kinda need it and was wondering if you would include it in the package in the next update?
alerque commented on 2024-07-10 20:25 (UTC)
Buyer beware on this one. I haven't audited the code of this project but I have followed several other projects from this upstream developer where they have done things like fork projects, nuke the history, illegally re-license them, then delete issues when they get posted to their GitHub. I have not seen any back doors, just really sleazy behavior towards FOSS and willfully trying to change the topic and point fingers elsewhere when the issues are pointed out. I would think twice before running this or relying on it for production work.
Pinned Comments
alerque commented on 2024-07-10 20:25 (UTC)
Buyer beware on this one. I haven't audited the code of this project but I have followed several other projects from this upstream developer where they have done things like fork projects, nuke the history, illegally re-license them, then delete issues when they get posted to their GitHub. I have not seen any back doors, just really sleazy behavior towards FOSS and willfully trying to change the topic and point fingers elsewhere when the issues are pointed out. I would think twice before running this or relying on it for production work.