Search Criteria
Package Details: python2-gobject2 2.28.7-7
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/python2-gobject2.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | python2-gobject2 |
| Description: | Legacy Python 2 bindings for GObject |
| Upstream URL: | https://wiki.gnome.org/Projects/PyGObject |
| Licenses: | LGPL |
| Conflicts: | pygobject2-devel |
| Provides: | pygobject2-devel |
| Replaces: | pygobject2-devel |
| Submitter: | jelly |
| Maintainer: | PhotonX |
| Last Packager: | PhotonX |
| Votes: | 49 |
| Popularity: | 0.38 |
| First Submitted: | 2021-01-10 11:33 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2021-10-23 19:51 (UTC) |
Dependencies (4)
- glib2 (glib2-gitAUR, glib2-patched-thumbnailerAUR)
- libffi (libffi-gitAUR)
- python2AUR (python2-binAUR, stackless2AUR)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR, git-wd40AUR) (make)
Required by (6)
- gmapcatcher
- keyboardlayouteditor-git
- pygtk
- python2-gudev (make)
- vte-legacy (requires pygobject2-devel) (make)
- wacom-utility
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2
Pippip19 commented on 2021-10-27 09:35 (UTC)
Should autoconf be listed as a dependency? (see line 29 of PKGBUILD)
PhotonX commented on 2021-10-23 19:46 (UTC)
@dreieck: Thanks for the report! According to https://pygobject.readthedocs.io/en/latest/packagingguide.html it is indeed a dependency. I wonder, does any AUR helper or similar app act differently depending on whether a dependency is direct or indirect. I guess, the package needs a bump in any case to get rebuilt, though...
dreieck commented on 2021-10-23 19:09 (UTC)
I got an error
ImportError: could not import gobject (error was: 'libffi.so.7: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory')(libffiwas updated to version 8//usr/lib/libffi.so.8) when running a software usingpython2-gobject2. It could be resolved by recompilingpython2-gobject2.So it seems that
python2-gobject2also directly depends onlibffi, not only indirectly viaglib2.So I suggest to explicitly add
libffias dependency because of this direct dependency.Thanks for having adopted this package!
PhotonX commented on 2021-06-19 15:58 (UTC)
Adopted, just to make sure that it won't get deleted at some point. ;)
« First ‹ Previous 1 2