Package Details: pytyle2-hg 2.0.0-2

Package Base: pytyle2-hg
Description: Auto/manual on-demand tiling manager that fits in any EWMH compatible window manager.
Upstream URL: http://pytyle.com
Category: x11
Licenses: GPL
Submitter: None
Maintainer: burntsushi
Last Packager: None
Votes: 17
First Submitted: 2010-11-03 05:27
Last Updated: 2012-03-30 01:39

Dependencies (2)

Required by (0)

Sources

Latest Comments

Anonymous comment

2012-03-30 15:30

thank you

Comment by burntsushi

2012-03-30 15:22

I updated the pytyle2 dependencies. You should just be able to install pytyle2-hg.

Anonymous comment

2012-03-30 14:24

burntsushi,
Thank you for the answer. If I understand correctly, you must first install "xorg-git-xpyb" before "Pytyle2-hg"?

Comment by burntsushi

2012-03-30 01:39

Whoops, I've updated the dependency to xorg-xpyb-git. Check my comments in the xorg-xpyb-git and xpyb-git package pages for the full scoop.

Anonymous comment

2012-03-29 21:52

Hello,
I use "Yaourt" to compile my packages from aur.
I wanted to install "Pytyle2-hg" but "yaourt" return an error message about "xpyb-git" ("makepkg could not build xpyb-git"). After checking, this dependence has not expired. Are you aware of a problem with "git-xpyb" and what does it do?
Thank you very much for your answer

Anonymous comment

2011-07-29 12:06

burntsushi,

You are right..... it pulled from the hg repo.... no need to include source. It threw me off because I never saw an AUR install without source or link to source included. Perhaps include a readme.txt file? (in case someone misses this discussion) :)

Comment by burntsushi

2011-07-26 13:46

Root-Minuz,

There are no "releases" yet for pytyle2, so I'm not sure that it makes sense to include the source in the tarball when it *should* be pulled from the hg repo. Unless it's convention to do otherwise?

Anonymous comment

2011-07-26 13:02

Tarball download is missing the source files. I did get them from sourceforge but at least a direct link should be included here.
Thanks!

Comment by burntsushi

2010-12-02 21:35

I've taken over this package and I've updated the PKGBUILD. It should be working now!

Comment by burntsushi

2010-11-29 06:08

All righty, I have a working PKGBUILD. I've sent it to the maintainer, but in the mean time, it can be accessed here:

http://pytyle.com/PKGBUILD

@ngoonee - You're right, patching isn't needed, but neither is sed. Python's distutils automatically updates the shebang with the appropriate version of Python (which is whatever version of Python that calls setup.py... In this case, python2).

Comment by ngoonee

2010-11-18 07:49

Also it doesn't seem to work currently. I may try to debug, but not right now, bumming time is up =)

Comment by ngoonee

2010-11-18 07:45

You're missing a dependency on mercurial, and you really should conflict with pytyle. Also there's no need for run.patch, just run the sed directly in the PKGBUILD. And don't use || return 1, not required anymore.

Thanks for the package =) been wanting to try this out.