Package Details: qgis-ltr 3.16.7-2

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: qgis-ltr
Description: Geographic Information System (GIS); Long Term Release
Upstream URL:
Keywords: GIS
Licenses: GPL
Conflicts: qgis
Provides: qgis=3.16.7
Submitter: saultdon
Maintainer: buzo
Last Packager: buzo
Votes: 14
Popularity: 0.000034
First Submitted: 2015-07-08 16:37
Last Updated: 2021-05-24 19:57

Dependencies (34)

Required by (4)

Sources (2)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Next › Last »

Scimmia commented on 2018-06-08 13:12

Whoever gave you that "fix" is an idiot. The correct fix is to rebuild against the new lib.

quipa commented on 2018-06-08 09:12

After asystem update (Manjaro Linux), having problems with libproj

$ qgis
qgis: error while loading shared libraries: cannot open shared object file: No such file or directory

Noticed the following in case it's useful:

$ ls /usr/lib/ | grep libproj

As a temporary fixed suggested on the qgis Gitter/IRC channel ran the following:

$ sudo ln -s -T /usr/lib/ /usr/lib/ /usr/lib/

kikislater commented on 2018-05-10 07:57

Easy way to run native building Qgis 2 and Qgis 3 on Archlinux at the same time :

kikislater commented on 2018-04-28 14:51

Easy way IMO is to run qgis-ltr in a docker container

znmeb commented on 2018-04-25 22:47

Count me as another vote for being able to install QGIS 2.18 and 3.x at the same time with different names. A package named qgis-ltr should install an executable named qgis-ltr and a package named qgis should install an executable named qgis.

cbertelli commented on 2018-03-03 10:35

@kikislater @Scimmia: I asked the same on version 3, the LTR is the right place to ask, anyway I thought about it. I think Scimmia would have a bad time finding out all the places where something should be changed and what happens when LTR will have a minor upgrade? It's an effort we should ask upstream to QGIS developers. Version 3 is too much different from the preceding version. It needs less plugins and conflicts with most. Anyway I keep thinking that having a separate version 2/LTR installed is a good idea. From a developer's point of view it may not make sense, but if you are working with QGIS, switching between the two version is at least very inconvenient.

kikislater commented on 2018-02-26 14:35

Better to have both installed ...

Scimmia commented on 2018-02-26 14:25

I guess I don't see what the big deal is. pacman -U <qgis.....pkg.tar.gz>, oh it doesn't work, pacman -U <qgis-ltr....pkg.tar.gz>. Takes less than a minute to switch.</qgis-ltr....pkg.tar.gz></qgis.....pkg.tar.gz>

kikislater commented on 2018-02-26 12:38

+1 for in production purpose. Qgis 3 is nice but not all plugins are working : need to be converting to python3

d7rk commented on 2018-02-26 09:49

@Scimmia It would be much much appreciated though. In order to be able to provide feedback on the preview while still have an operational qgis for production purposes... If impossible on your side, could you provide pointers on how to do it? Cheers,