Search Criteria
Package Details: qsv-bin 3.2.0-2
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/qsv-bin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | qsv-bin |
Description: | CSVs sliced, diced & analyzed. Quicksilver (qsv) is a fork of the popular xsv utility |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/dathere/qsv |
Licenses: | MIT, Unlicense |
Conflicts: | qsv |
Provides: | qsv |
Submitter: | tee |
Maintainer: | tee |
Last Packager: | tee |
Votes: | 2 |
Popularity: | 0.130639 |
First Submitted: | 2023-07-24 02:08 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2025-03-12 12:18 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2
plg commented on 2024-06-04 12:17 (UTC)
fyi the zip's checksum is incorrect again for v0.128.0
kepi commented on 2024-02-06 11:40 (UTC)
@tee - the problem IMHO is - and I might be mistaken, thats just what I found after much digging - that sources from PKGBUILD get downloaded directly to ~/.cache/sources
So in your case, LICENSE-MIT get downloaded to ~/.cache/sources/LICENSE-MIT
And when some other AUR package do the same (and many do) and is installed before yours, you'll get checksum fail because usually there is name of author and year in license. I'm not sure if this is problem only in
yay
which I'm using, or if every AUR helper works same. I don't understand why, by default, every source isn't unpacked to package directory, but it doesn't.tee commented on 2024-02-04 06:37 (UTC)
@kepi The download checksum was correct at the time of release, they must have silently re-released it after I updated the package here.
Regarding the license files, they reside in their own package specific directory and should not be overwritten by other packages, otherwise pacman will warn. They may get updated if the developers bump the license year in the file.
I've done a clean build to verify this. :)
kepi commented on 2024-02-03 17:51 (UTC) (edited on 2024-02-03 17:51 (UTC) by kepi)
I'm getting failed checksum for zip file for couple days now. I also noticed, that you are using unnamed sources for licenses, which means that they will get overwritten by other packages, who are using same approach. See more in my comment https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/rotki-bin#comment-948226
Here is patch which fixes both issues (assuming that I'm getting correct file from github and not spoofed one...).
« First ‹ Previous 1 2