Package Details: quickbms 0.12.0-2

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: quickbms
Description: Files extractor and reimporter, archives and file formats parser, advanced tool for reversers and power users and much more.
Upstream URL:
Licenses: GPL2
Submitter: z3ntu
Maintainer: jkl
Last Packager: jkl
Votes: 10
Popularity: 0.78
First Submitted: 2016-06-14 08:00 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-01-11 02:08 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 Next › Last »

adriaticc commented on 2024-05-30 13:18 (UTC)

Numerous compiler errors can be suppressed with CFLAGS="-Wno-error=incompatible-pointer-types -Wno-error=implicit-function-declaration".

Linker errors related to __c11_atomic_load and __c11_atomic_store can be fixed with something like sed -i 's/c_atomic/nonexistent_feature/' extra/stdatomic.h. This BSD header erroneously detects clang because __has_feature(c_atomic) is true.

murlakatamenka commented on 2024-01-10 20:01 (UTC)

This package doesn't build with clang. Please, use GCC explicitly:

build() {
  cd src

  CC=GCC make

MarsSeed commented on 2023-08-03 19:13 (UTC)

You could mention game modders in the description as well, as target audience. Their use case is the prime motivation behind this project.

FelixWolf commented on 2023-07-19 18:21 (UTC)

RSA_SSLV23_PADDING was deprecated due to CVE-2021-23839. Here is a patch that fixes it (Seems consistent with how other software is doing it) 0001-Fix-OpenSSL-V21-padding-deprecation.patch

NorthWestWind commented on 2023-05-01 10:38 (UTC)

error: ‘RSA_SSLV23_PADDING’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘RSA_NO_PADDING’

I bypassed this error by modifying the Makefile. Removed USE_OPENSSL = 1 and it compiles, but some features are probably disabled by this and I'm not sure about which are.

Zebouski commented on 2023-01-10 04:51 (UTC)

Builds are failing for me with this

error: ‘RSA_SSLV23_PADDING’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘RSA_NO_PADDING’

Looks like a change made in openssl 3? I do have openssl-1.1 installed as well but still no good, maybe I'm doing something wrong.

roadtang commented on 2022-03-07 07:31 (UTC)

while just want to notify 0.11.0 is out. also, thanks for the package, it looks like not easy to maintenance a package.

z3ntu commented on 2021-07-15 17:21 (UTC)

Yes and no. I've looked at the patch you provided but it didn't seem like a correct solution because I think it will definitely break functionality within that file. Of course you can use this presumably incorrect version as long as you don't use the exact functionality, but I don't want to provide everyone with this version. And I'm a bit tired of fixing quickbms with every release because upstream breaks in completely weird ways all the time (and the ridiculous makefile with compiles everyone in one go also doesn't help).

silverhikari commented on 2021-07-15 05:12 (UTC)

is this package still being maintained? (i don't intend this to sound rude or mean)

silverhikari commented on 2021-06-28 23:37 (UTC) (edited on 2021-07-10 16:13 (UTC) by silverhikari)

here is the link for the pkgbuild including the compilepatch and a .SRCINFO EDIT: remade zip and replaced the pkgbuild with a diff patch