Search Criteria
Package Details: rdiff-backup 2.2.6-2
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/rdiff-backup.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | rdiff-backup |
Description: | Reverse differential backup tool, over a network or locally |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup |
Licenses: | GPL-2.0-only |
Submitter: | arojas |
Maintainer: | carsme |
Last Packager: | carsme |
Votes: | 17 |
Popularity: | 0.126642 |
First Submitted: | 2023-04-01 17:24 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-01-28 22:56 (UTC) |
Dependencies (16)
- glibc (glibc-gitAUR, glibc-linux4AUR, glibc-eacAUR)
- librsync (librsync-gitAUR)
- procps-ng (procps-ng-gitAUR, busybox-coreutilsAUR)
- python (python37AUR, python311AUR, python310AUR)
- python-psutil
- python-yaml (python-yaml-gitAUR)
- asciidoctor (make)
- python-build (make)
- python-installer (python-installer-gitAUR) (make)
- python-setuptools (make)
- python-setuptools-scm (make)
- python-wheel (make)
- python-pylibacl (check)
- python-pyxattr (check)
- python-pylibacl (optional) – access control list support
- python-pyxattr (optional) – extended attribute support
Required by (4)
- backupninja-git (optional)
- mscs
- safekeep
- sibt-git
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next › Last »
rwd2 commented on 2023-08-08 19:22 (UTC)
Would it be possible to add i686 support as well? I am running an old version of rdiff-backup on arch32, and the package is about to be dropped from the repository.
carsme commented on 2023-07-25 13:32 (UTC)
Thank you for reporting and investigating the issues, @apocalyptech and @muesli4. Appreciate it!
To mitigate these I've:
testing/eas_aclstest.py
andtesting/fs_abilitiestest.py
).See be9bc4c16760 for further details.
Hopefully the package is buildable for you now, if not let me know.
muesli4 commented on 2023-07-04 20:28 (UTC)
I have test whether my filesystem does support them and can confirm. But I found that these are not the only errors. I created an issue in the project: https://github.com/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup/issues/897
apocalyptech commented on 2023-07-04 03:24 (UTC) (edited on 2023-07-04 03:24 (UTC) by apocalyptech)
I see that those errors are both extended-attribute related. Do you happen to be building on a filesystem which doesn't support EAs / ACLs?
FWIW, after figuring out the timezone-related problems below, all the tests succeeded fine on my own machine, at least.
muesli4 commented on 2023-07-03 23:25 (UTC)
I got these test failures when building.
It is really scary to get these from a backup utility, especially when you needed a backup.
apocalyptech commented on 2023-06-26 20:26 (UTC)
@LA-MJ - Ah yeah, the tests are very noisy and the output definitely includes some filenames with which they seemed to be testing various unicode-related conditions. I'd seen some filenames scroll past with some wild series-of-unintelligible-characters on 'em. On an
en_US.UTF-8
console it doesn't actually screw up the whole terminal, but I'm not surprised that it could do so for other terms@simon.wiles - Yeah, the path of least resistance is difficult to turn away from, for sure. :) Also makes sense why it was never caught before -- presumably the build machines for the main developers are all set to UTC (or postitive offsets), and I'm sure many folks building it manually either don't run the tests or ignore their output.
LA-MJ commented on 2023-06-26 20:13 (UTC)
Tests seem to corrupt my terminal with some horrendous output.
Solved it by doing the following:
simon.wiles commented on 2023-06-26 17:08 (UTC)
@apocalyptech Thanks for looking into this -- good find! It'd been bothering me for a while (UTC-8), but I'd not found the time to look into it and I confess I'd just installed rdiff-backup with pipx...
apocalyptech commented on 2023-06-26 16:22 (UTC)
Submitted an Issue to upstream @ https://github.com/rdiff-backup/rdiff-backup/issues/892 btw
apocalyptech commented on 2023-06-26 16:10 (UTC)
Aha, interesting -- the actual failure at the end there, which I was running into as well, appears to be system-timezone related:
It's checking for a datetime in January 1970, but if you're in a timezone that's sufficiently negative of GMT (maybe starting at about -2), the date shows up in 1969 instead, which doesn't match their regex. It looks like that can be fixed by setting TZ=utc inside
check
, a la:Putting that in place lets the build process get through all the tests.
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 Next › Last »