Search Criteria
Package Details: rlvm-git latest-1
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/rlvm-git.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | rlvm-git |
| Description: | RealLive clone for Linux and OSX. Git version. |
| Upstream URL: | https://github.com/eglaysher/rlvm |
| Keywords: | engine game |
| Licenses: | GPL-3.0-or-later |
| Conflicts: | rlvm |
| Provides: | rlvm |
| Submitter: | maz-1 |
| Maintainer: | neeshy |
| Last Packager: | neeshy |
| Votes: | 10 |
| Popularity: | 0.000076 |
| First Submitted: | 2015-10-14 00:54 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2026-02-12 04:07 (UTC) |
Dependencies (14)
- boost-libs
- glew (glew-libepoxyAUR, glew-wayland-gitAUR, glew-gitAUR)
- gtk3 (gtk3-no_deadkeys_underlineAUR, gtk3-classicAUR, gtk3-patched-filechooser-icon-viewAUR, gtk3-classic-xfceAUR)
- guichan
- libmad
- libogg (libogg-gitAUR)
- libpng (libpng-gitAUR, libpng-apngAUR)
- libvorbis (libvorbis-aotuvAUR, libvorbis-aotuv-lancerAUR, libvorbis-gitAUR)
- sdl_image
- sdl_mixer
- sdl_ttf
- boost (boost-gitAUR) (make)
- git (git-gitAUR, git-glAUR, git-wd40AUR) (make)
- scons (make)
Latest Comments
1 2 3 Next › Last »
Bombyyy commented on 2026-02-14 09:00 (UTC)
resolved with the new update. thanks!
Bombyyy commented on 2026-02-10 12:03 (UTC) (edited on 2026-02-10 12:03 (UTC) by Bombyyy)
i keep getting
which i find confusing because the boost on my system is 1.89.0-4.1...
neeshy commented on 2024-12-24 22:03 (UTC)
It seems like if
lua51is installed some problematic tests get pulled in. Fixed.cyberpunkrocker commented on 2024-12-21 09:11 (UTC)
Nope, still not building:
sam99 commented on 2024-12-20 04:35 (UTC)
Apparently the patches in includes.patch aren't needed anymore as the changes are already been brought upstream.
cyberpunkrocker commented on 2024-09-04 17:43 (UTC)
Ugh... The boost update to 1.86.0 broke rlvm compilation again.
cyberpunkrocker commented on 2024-08-22 12:14 (UTC)
Checksum error
cyberpunkrocker commented on 2022-06-19 14:01 (UTC)
As the boost update (again) broke rlvm, I started recompiling it as usual, but this time compilation ended with an error:
I suppose this may be caused by the recent gcc update? (11->12)
carstene1ns commented on 2017-04-01 02:48 (UTC)
1 2 3 Next › Last »