Package Details: rmlint-git 2.2.0.r33-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/rmlint-git.git (read-only)
Package Base: rmlint-git
Description: Tool to remove duplicates and other lint, being much faster than fdupes
Upstream URL: https://github.com/sahib/rmlint
Keywords: cleaner duplicate fast fdupes file finder system
Licenses: GPL3
Conflicts: rmlint
Provides: rmlint
Submitter: SahibBommelig
Maintainer: SahibBommelig
Last Packager: SahibBommelig
Votes: 30
Popularity: 0.000532
First Submitted: 2011-03-27 13:10
Last Updated: 2015-10-13 17:09

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3

SahibBommelig commented on 2013-09-28 22:09

@AndreasBWagner: git+https:// did not work. I changed it simply to https.

lowfatcomputing commented on 2013-09-27 13:36

You should change git:// to git+https:// so people can install this when the git protocol is blocked. Thanks!

SahibBommelig commented on 2013-04-10 22:07

Thanks SanskritFritz, done.t

SahibBommelig commented on 2013-04-10 22:01

Thanks SanskritFritz, done.t

SanskritFritz commented on 2013-04-10 21:40

Updated PKGBUILD: http://sprunge.us/gAWJ

menta commented on 2011-04-18 12:14

Please add "provides=('rmlint')" and "conflicts=('rmlint')" to the PKGBUILD. You may also change the "pkgver" field to reflect the date when the PKGBUILD was changed last time.

SahibBommelig commented on 2011-03-27 18:39

Indeed, arch=(any) is wrong, sorry.
Changed it to i686/x86_64.. I should read more documentation.

Also removed the comment (although I wonder what should be bad here ;-))

SahibBommelig commented on 2011-03-27 18:39

Indeed, arch=(any) is wrong, sorry.
Changed it to i686/x86_64.. I should read more documentation.

Also removed the comment (although I wonder what should be bad here ;-))

SahibBommelig commented on 2011-03-27 16:55

Indeed, arch=(any) is wrong, sorry.
Changed it to i686/x86_64.. I should read more documentation.

Also removed the comment (although I wonder what should be bad here ;-))

Anonymous comment on 2011-03-27 16:48

arch=(any) is definitely wrong here! And why such a comment for glibc as dependency??