Package Details: rockchip-mpp 1:1.0.11-3

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/rockchip-mpp.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: rockchip-mpp
Description: Rockchip Media Process Platform (MPP)
Upstream URL: https://github.com/HermanChen/mpp/
Licenses: MIT, Apache-2.0
Submitter: dbermond
Maintainer: dbermond
Last Packager: dbermond
Votes: 26
Popularity: 0.61
First Submitted: 2017-10-24 19:30 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2026-05-10 02:42 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last »

boogiepop commented on 2023-01-31 10:16 (UTC) (edited on 2023-01-31 10:22 (UTC) by boogiepop)

you can use mpp-git package which is the updated version of mpp. This current version from 2017 rockchip-mpp does not work anymore.

Can i ask for deletion of this package @dbermod?

Accidentaccio commented on 2023-01-30 22:38 (UTC)

Reports that it fails to compile actually. The error is: ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!

FabioLolix commented on 2021-07-19 17:19 (UTC)

While this code compile on x86_64 what is its pratical use?

FabioLolix commented on 2021-06-24 18:10 (UTC)

Isn't Rockchip Media Process Platform ARM specific? On which x86_64 hardware can be used?

dbermond commented on 2021-01-09 02:43 (UTC)

@EndlessEden I cannot support arm architectures, sorry. rockchip-mpp is the name of the package, so no need to add it to conflicts for conflicting with itself.

EndlessEden commented on 2021-01-03 14:00 (UTC) (edited on 2021-01-08 06:16 (UTC) by EndlessEden)

@dbermond: Can you add aarch64 to the arch list and add rockchip-mpp to the conflicts list.

dbermond commented on 2020-09-17 20:51 (UTC)

@bobpaul https://github.com/HermanChen/mpp/issues/15

bobpaul commented on 2020-09-17 13:02 (UTC)

Is https://github.com/HermanChen/mpp the same software?

Kyuunex commented on 2020-09-17 00:05 (UTC) (edited on 2020-09-17 00:06 (UTC) by Kyuunex)

the github repository no longer exists, the file download fails and thus, the package build fails

dbermond commented on 2020-05-25 15:46 (UTC)

@bobpaul This is an issue with gcc10. I've added a patch to fix it and now the package is building fine.

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 Next › Last »