Search Criteria
Package Details: rotki-bin 1.36.1-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/rotki-bin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | rotki-bin |
Description: | A portfolio tracking, analytics, accounting and tax reporting application that respects your privacy |
Upstream URL: | https://rotki.com |
Keywords: | accounting analytics bitcoin blockchain cryptocurrencies cryptocurrency-exchanges cryptocurrency-portfolio cryptocurrency-portfolio-tracking ethereum portfolio-tracker tax tax-reporting tracking |
Licenses: | BSD |
Provides: | rotki |
Submitter: | ragouel |
Maintainer: | TripleSpeeder |
Last Packager: | TripleSpeeder |
Votes: | 12 |
Popularity: | 0.005772 |
First Submitted: | 2020-07-28 16:11 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-12-02 15:43 (UTC) |
Dependencies (4)
- gtk3 (gtk3-no_deadkeys_underlineAUR, gtk3-classicAUR, gtk3-classic-xfceAUR, gtk3-patched-filechooser-icon-viewAUR)
- nss (nss-hgAUR)
- gendesk (make)
- imagemagick (imagemagick-gitAUR, imagemagick-full-gitAUR, imagemagick-fullAUR) (make)
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
PerePapouilles commented on 2024-03-05 10:26 (UTC) (edited on 2024-03-05 10:32 (UTC) by PerePapouilles)
imagemagick package seems to be necessary to generate the icons in the PKGBUILD. I recommend adding it to the build dependency.
TripleSpeeder commented on 2023-12-18 08:18 (UTC)
Pkgbuild is now using unique filenames for all source files, so the checksum issue should be fixed.
Thank you @kepi for pointing out the issue!
kepi commented on 2023-12-17 20:35 (UTC) (edited on 2023-12-17 20:35 (UTC) by kepi)
OK, this really got on my nerves :) as its only package which I can't normally install. But I seen something similar before.
And I solved it in totally unexpected way. SHA256 sum in PKGBUILD is definitelly correct, you can quickly check it with:
But calamity is right, that
updpkgsum
is giving different result. Why? Long story short, both are correct! :)Whole problem is in fact that
source
inPKBUILD
is pointing to shared directory, where all your sources are. And voila, problem is simply in the fact, thatLICENSE
is already there, but from different package... IMHO that is huge problem in PKBUILD itself, if I'm right, but let's resolve just this package.Here is quick patch that resolves this:
calamity commented on 2022-11-29 20:34 (UTC) (edited on 2022-11-29 20:47 (UTC) by calamity)
Sorry to bother, but makepkg is still complaining about an invalid hashsum of the
LICENSE
.updpkgsum
computes this as the correct one:d2a29823384e9194a87936ccad495c764c2ef733b29bfa6f72a1d65803ce02e5
frangio commented on 2022-10-08 22:29 (UTC)
imagemagick should be added as a build dependency.
dbrgn commented on 2022-08-19 07:52 (UTC) (edited on 2022-08-19 07:52 (UTC) by dbrgn)
The LICENSE integrity check is still (or again) broken.
starise commented on 2022-01-21 23:34 (UTC) (edited on 2022-01-21 23:35 (UTC) by starise)
LICENSE check is broken again.
TripleSpeeder commented on 2021-02-25 19:05 (UTC)
LICENSE fixed, thanks mat :-)
mat commented on 2021-02-25 13:15 (UTC)
Looks like the LICENSE changed again.
ragouel commented on 2020-12-26 23:06 (UTC)
Fixed.
1 2 Next › Last »