Search Criteria
Package Details: rslsync 2.7.3-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/rslsync.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | rslsync |
Description: | Resilio Sync (ex:BitTorrent Sync) - automatically sync files via secure, distributed technology |
Upstream URL: | https://www.getsync.com |
Licenses: | custom:resilio |
Submitter: | widowild |
Maintainer: | widowild (fryfrog) |
Last Packager: | fryfrog |
Votes: | 360 |
Popularity: | 1.10 |
First Submitted: | 2016-09-25 13:20 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2022-03-31 17:06 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 .. 56 Next › Last »
micahscopes commented on 2018-11-25 06:05 (UTC)
The sha256sum for rslsync_x64-2.6.1.1319.tar.gz seems to have changed:
sha256sums_x86_64=('82f940a130a0e82c3b020dd9cb1381ae0c0f2b52dee1b7eff81f90b3c997086f')
lbm commented on 2018-08-09 21:19 (UTC)
@fryfrog, all good with latest snapshot, thanks!
fryfrog commented on 2018-08-09 21:11 (UTC)
Pulled in your
/run
changes and renamed the tmpfiles.d file to match all my other AUR packages. Hows that?lbm commented on 2018-08-09 21:00 (UTC)
@fryfrog, tested the patch below on my aarch64 system without any issues.
lbm commented on 2018-08-09 20:58 (UTC)
Patch with fix for aarch64 and systemd-tmpfiles warning: https://gist.github.com/lassebm/4e08ea2cea28654b9a38870ddc83ce7c
fryfrog commented on 2018-08-09 20:54 (UTC)
@lbm, can you try that?
lbm commented on 2018-08-09 20:42 (UTC)
With 2.6.0, an aarch64 build is now available from Resilio: https://download-cdn.resilio.com/stable/linux-arm64/resilio-sync_arm64.tar.gz
This is required on Arch Linux ARM aarch64 as it won't run armhf executables.
malageza commented on 2018-03-30 18:36 (UTC)
It looks like the rslsync.conf file is not a valid config file.
The checksum for armv7h and aarch64 should be: sha256sums_armv7h=('ef333df6da04dd3116f7f48a7228851b6d168ba65c54a7b320c719d6fc533a9a') sha256sums_aarch64=('ef333df6da04dd3116f7f48a7228851b6d168ba65c54a7b320c719d6fc533a9a')
fryfrog commented on 2018-03-27 04:12 (UTC)
Looks like checksums changed across the board. :/
Moo-Crumpus commented on 2018-03-27 04:09 (UTC)
sha256sum for x64 is wrong, should read sha256sums_x86_64=('0cc68621543ae29a4373196709a5962868b69e5631238673723d858aa3d8fd0b')
« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 .. 56 Next › Last »