Package Details: rstudio-desktop-bin 2024.12.0.467-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/rstudio-desktop-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: rstudio-desktop-bin
Description: An integrated development environment (IDE) for R (binary from RStudio official repository)
Upstream URL: http://www.rstudio.org/
Licenses: GPL
Conflicts: rstudio-desktop, rstudio-desktop-git, rstudio-desktop-preview-bin
Provides: rstudio-desktop
Submitter: Meow
Maintainer: Meow
Last Packager: Meow
Votes: 352
Popularity: 3.95
First Submitted: 2011-06-16 16:26 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-12-20 01:26 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 .. 29 Next › Last »

Atom194 commented on 2023-09-20 12:00 (UTC)

@cbrnr I do not use KDE either.

cbrnr commented on 2023-09-20 11:42 (UTC)

@Atom194 it's probably not necessary, I just left it in for good measure, since I don't use KDE myself (so I can't test it). Can you try if everything works as expected in KDE if you do not export this variable?

Atom194 commented on 2023-09-20 11:12 (UTC) (edited on 2023-09-20 11:13 (UTC) by Atom194)

@cbrnr

Is export KDEDIRS=/usr neceserry in cbrnr PKGBUILD? [1]

I do not know what the KDEDIRS variable does. I am guessing that it is only necessary for KDE users?

[1] rstudio-desktop-bin | cbrnr commented on 2023-07-17 08:32 (UTC) (edited on 2023-07-17 09:34 (UTC) by cbrnr)

Atom194 commented on 2023-09-20 10:55 (UTC) (edited on 2023-09-20 11:14 (UTC) by Atom194)

@Meow

Is there a reason why the package does not add an executable to /usr/bin ?

Simple ln -s /usr/lib/rstudio/rstudio /usr/bin/rstudio-desktop-bin should do the trick.

Could this command be added to PKGBUILD?

cbrnr commented on 2023-09-11 13:45 (UTC)

The new release does not contain the menu entry, again. Users will wonder how to start RStudio. Is there a particular reason why you ignore all comments related to packaging and other improvements?

xiota commented on 2023-08-27 23:46 (UTC)

Conflicts with rstudio-desktop-git, rstudio-desktop-preview-bin are unnecessary because they both provide rstudio-desktop.

cbrnr commented on 2023-07-17 08:32 (UTC) (edited on 2023-07-17 09:34 (UTC) by cbrnr)

The latest PKGBUILD, which includes a fix for the missing desktop icon, drops the openssl-1.1 requirement, and has some convenient improvements regarding the two version strings and the multi-line echo at the bottom, is available here:

https://gist.github.com/cbrnr/9bad76d97ff17e37980cf40416fc5596

@Meow it would be great if you integrated these fixes. Or is there a reason why you think this is a bad idea?

Muflone commented on 2023-07-01 20:48 (UTC)

@antipersistent

while I understand the rstudio-desktop-bin package has the path issue but please avoid to create duplicated packages and try to collaborate with the rstudio-desktop-bin package to fix that

The deletion request will be accepted

skertberg commented on 2023-06-21 20:57 (UTC) (edited on 2023-06-21 21:03 (UTC) by skertberg)

@Meow I would like to second cbrnr's comment. Would it be possible for the maintainer to update the PKGBUILD so that the binary is on the PATH by default? Currently I am using hopimet's fix (2022-12-26), but ideally this should be corrected natively.

I also tried the new rstudio-bin package, but rstudio-desktop-bin is currently much more popular, so a fix here would be useful to many people.

cbrnr commented on 2023-06-19 10:10 (UTC)

@antipersistent I am aware of the comments in the other package. I wanted to point out that now there are two packages that provide RStudio (binary), which is not ideal from a user perspective. Given that rstudio-desktop-bin is way more popular, chances are that users are going to try that by default. So I was just wondering if you and the maintainers of rstudio-desktop-bin might be interested in joining efforts to provide just one package for RStudio. In any case, thanks for providing a working version!

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 .. 29 Next › Last »