Package Details: ruby-reverse_markdown 2.1.1-3

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/ruby-reverse_markdown.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: ruby-reverse_markdown
Description: Ruby gem to convert html into markdown
Upstream URL: https://github.com/xijo/reverse_markdown
Licenses: WTFPL
Submitter: mnussbaum
Maintainer: rlees85
Last Packager: rlees85
Votes: 4
Popularity: 0.000002
First Submitted: 2018-05-25 22:49 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-10-08 07:07 (UTC)

Latest Comments

rubin55 commented on 2024-10-10 18:03 (UTC) (edited on 2024-10-10 18:07 (UTC) by rubin55)

I'm getting an error while trying to build this package:

ERROR:  While executing gem ... (Errno::ENOENT)
    No such file or directory @ dir_s_mkdir - /tmp/makepkg.builddir/ruby-reverse_markdown/src/reverse_markdown-2.1.1/tmpinstall/usr/bin

Update: This was because I had set GEM_HOME; after unsetting that, the build went fine.

rlees85 commented on 2024-10-03 08:18 (UTC)

Also affecting me now, be nice if maintainer could drop the dependency and just add the license to the package if not done so already.

Coelacanthus commented on 2024-06-03 12:20 (UTC)

license-wtfpl has been deleted from AUR.

FabioLolix commented on 2024-01-28 15:23 (UTC)

Arch Linux still does not include WTFPL as common license

It has been removed recently I guess, anyway now there are only spdx licenses

Coelacanthus commented on 2024-01-28 15:06 (UTC)

Oops. Arch Linux still does not include WTFPL as common license. But license array still need to be updated. Using another package to include license is not the correct way in Arch Linux Packaging. You must include license file in your package. namcap will check whether your package includes license file.

FabioLolix commented on 2024-01-17 16:46 (UTC)

I believe I've included the license now through the license-wtfpl package

That isn't how it is done but anyway no actions are needed now since the WTFPL is in the licenses package as pointed out by Coelacanthus

Please remove the depends on license-wtfpl pkgbuild, I'll queued it for deletion soon

Coelacanthus commented on 2024-01-16 15:16 (UTC)

Hi, WTFPL has been included in official licenses package as a part of RFC16. Please use license=(WTFPL) and remove license-wtfpl depends.

mnussbaum commented on 2023-05-16 17:58 (UTC)

Thanks @FabioLolix, I believe I've included the license now through the license-wtfpl package

FabioLolix commented on 2023-05-14 15:58 (UTC)

Hello, a license like WTFPL which isn't part of the licenses package need to be installed in "${pkgdir}/usr/share/licenses/${pkgname}"