Search Criteria
Package Details: ruby-reverse_markdown 2.1.1-2
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/ruby-reverse_markdown.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | ruby-reverse_markdown |
Description: | Ruby gem to convert html into markdown |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/xijo/reverse_markdown |
Licenses: | custom:WTFPL |
Submitter: | mnussbaum |
Maintainer: | mnussbaum |
Last Packager: | mnussbaum |
Votes: | 4 |
Popularity: | 0.006414 |
First Submitted: | 2018-05-25 22:49 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2023-05-16 17:57 (UTC) |
Dependencies (4)
- license-wtfplAUR
- ruby
- ruby-nokogiri
- rubygems (rubygems-userAUR) (make)
Latest Comments
FabioLolix commented on 2024-01-28 15:23 (UTC)
It has been removed recently I guess, anyway now there are only spdx licenses
Coelacanthus commented on 2024-01-28 15:06 (UTC)
Oops. Arch Linux still does not include WTFPL as common license. But license array still need to be updated. Using another package to include license is not the correct way in Arch Linux Packaging. You must include license file in your package. namcap will check whether your package includes license file.
FabioLolix commented on 2024-01-17 16:46 (UTC)
That isn't how it is done but anyway no actions are needed now since the WTFPL is in the licenses package as pointed out by Coelacanthus
Please remove the depends on license-wtfpl pkgbuild, I'll queued it for deletion soon
Coelacanthus commented on 2024-01-16 15:16 (UTC)
Hi, WTFPL has been included in official licenses package as a part of RFC16. Please use license=(WTFPL) and remove license-wtfpl depends.
mnussbaum commented on 2023-05-16 17:58 (UTC)
Thanks @FabioLolix, I believe I've included the license now through the license-wtfpl package
FabioLolix commented on 2023-05-14 15:58 (UTC)
Hello, a license like
WTFPL
which isn't part of thelicenses
package need to be installed in"${pkgdir}/usr/share/licenses/${pkgname}"