Search Criteria
Package Details: salt-onedir 3007.6-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/salt-onedir.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | salt-onedir |
Description: | Central system and configuration manager (onedir installation +[]) |
Upstream URL: | http://saltstack.org/ |
Licenses: | Apache-2.0 |
Conflicts: | salt, salt-raet, salt-zmq |
Provides: | salt |
Replaces: | salt-raet, salt-zmq |
Submitter: | spookfish |
Maintainer: | spookfish |
Last Packager: | spookfish |
Votes: | 3 |
Popularity: | 0.011984 |
First Submitted: | 2024-05-20 17:10 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2025-07-15 16:04 (UTC) |
Dependencies (2)
- rsync (rsync-gitAUR, rsync-reflink-gitAUR, rsync-reflinkAUR) (make)
- dmidecode (dmidecode-gitAUR) (optional) – decode SMBIOS/DMI tables
Required by (0)
Sources (5)
- 0000-services.patch
- https://github.com/saltstack/salt/releases/download/v3007.6/salt-3007.6-onedir-linux-arm64.tar.xz
- https://github.com/saltstack/salt/releases/download/v3007.6/salt-3007.6-onedir-linux-x86_64.tar.xz
- https://github.com/saltstack/salt/releases/download/v3007.6/salt-3007.6.tar.gz
- salt.logrotate
Latest Comments
1 2 3 Next › Last »
cooldiver2 commented on 2025-07-16 00:38 (UTC)
Thank you for updating the package.
Yes master/minion connection errors are only related to 3007.5 and older. With newer versions it is fixed and compatibility is back again.
spookfish commented on 2025-07-15 16:05 (UTC)
Thanks @cooldiver2 for the patch. Updated the package to use github sources for 3007.6. FYI Upgrade path from 3007.5 was smooth for me, no master/minion compatibility issues.
cooldiver2 commented on 2025-07-12 06:51 (UTC)
Packages from broadcom and github are the same. Cehcked via sah256sum. So I moved to github sources only. One place to get all the stuff for building.
Also updated to new version 3007.6.
Best regards Sven
ipaqmaster commented on 2025-07-11 02:51 (UTC)
Hell yeah. Thank you very much, I'll try it tonight.
spookfish commented on 2025-07-10 12:56 (UTC)
@ipaqmaster Good news, turns out makepkg perfectly supports this situation! I added back aarch64 support with explicit per-arch sources. I cannot test the aarch64 build as I have no such environment currently available to me, so please let me know if it works as intended now :)
spookfish commented on 2025-07-10 12:12 (UTC) (edited on 2025-07-10 12:23 (UTC) by spookfish)
@ipaqmaster Apologies, yes this was an oversight from switching to the prebuilt version... With the manual build, it automatically built for whatever arch you were on.
Unfortunately, I currently don't think there's a good way to make this package build for the right arch automatically. I think the best option will be a dedicated salt-onedir-arm64 package that picks the arm64 prebuilt from broadcom. Let me look into this.
EDIT: FYI I removed aarch64 from this one now.
ipaqmaster commented on 2025-07-10 02:11 (UTC) (edited on 2025-07-10 02:15 (UTC) by ipaqmaster)
I built this in an aarch64 environment and it seems to have resulted in a package that has x86_64 binaries inside. This package claims to support aarch64 and
qemu-aarch64-static
was used for an aarch64 environment. The build took a lot longer than x86_64. But somehow I have a package file with x86_64 python binaries inside.I think the ${source} variable explicitly grabs an x86_64 build of salt-onedir.
cooldiver2 commented on 2025-07-09 06:18 (UTC) (edited on 2025-07-09 06:21 (UTC) by cooldiver2)
For humans, how want to build it by themselves:
Issue with dependency from salt is fixed and will used latest versions of relenv and python.
Best regards Sven
spookfish commented on 2025-07-03 01:37 (UTC) (edited on 2025-07-03 01:38 (UTC) by spookfish)
Updated to salt 3007.5. I finally switched to using the prebuilt onedir tarball as per @wzyboy suggestion from months ago. Unfortunately, the manual relenv build process was very fragile, and I had too many issues getting it to work for 3007.5. I believe that using the upstream tarball is in any case the most sensible solution.
The SALT_ADDITIONAL_PIP_PACKAGES env var is still supported by the PKGBUILD.
Note that the location of the salt executables moved from /opt/salt/bin to /opt/salt. The upstream tarball is built that way, and I decided not to manually retain the previous layout.
spookfish commented on 2025-07-01 21:15 (UTC)
Hi, @sven thanks for the patch. I had been on vacation and will push the update very soon. Sorry for the delay.
1 2 3 Next › Last »