Search Criteria
Package Details: samsung-unified-driver-printer 1.00.39-6
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/samsung-unified-driver.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | samsung-unified-driver |
Description: | Unified Linux Driver for Samsung printers and scanners. |
Upstream URL: | http://www.samsung.com |
Licenses: | custom:samsung |
Submitter: | ptb |
Maintainer: | christoph.gysin |
Last Packager: | christoph.gysin |
Votes: | 214 |
Popularity: | 1.13 |
First Submitted: | 2010-12-06 00:01 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2022-05-17 13:08 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
fow0ryl commented on 2022-05-15 15:47 (UTC)
Please remove line 17 (depends=) in PKGBUILD
There are qualified "depends" statements in function package_samsung-unified-driver-printer and package_samsung-unified-driver-scanner. But "depends" in line 17 overwrites those statements. And because of this i.e sane is installed, even if only printer driver is installed ...
sanatan commented on 2022-03-28 09:05 (UTC)
Hello Dear I came across this reddit page https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/tpimqh/aur_did_it_again/ You really did help me to make my printer working properly. So Thank You
gabrielelinux commented on 2021-09-30 08:31 (UTC) (edited on 2021-09-30 08:43 (UTC) by gabrielelinux)
@christoph.gysin: Thank you, I tried to install it on a fresh arch install and it works perfectly.
[EDIT]: Seeing news from the coreutils package, it seems that they are trying to fix this wrong chmod behaviour. It will be fixed with the new update to "coreutils" 9.0.2
christoph.gysin commented on 2021-09-30 07:55 (UTC)
@gabrielelinux: Thanks for reporting, should be fixed now.
gabrielelinux commented on 2021-09-29 21:10 (UTC) (edited on 2021-09-29 21:36 (UTC) by gabrielelinux)
I'm having issues installing this AUR package both with paru and with "makepkg -si". The installation stops when the process reaches the "prepare" stage. On terminal it says "An error happened in prepare().".
[EDIT]: Reading similar issues on the AUR packages, like a recent similar issue with the "spotify" package, I think the problem might be related to a change in the chmod command, with the new update of the "coreutils" package. It might affect the installation process because I saw that in the PKGBUILD at the beginning of the prepare() stage, there is a "chmod" command. But this is only an assumption.
maggis commented on 2020-07-20 21:46 (UTC)
I could, but I'm now quite sure it's not related to the source: previously, I've had an ancient version of the driver installed (4.01.17). When upgrading to your package, removing the printer from cups, then re-adding it, the black page issue happened. When restarting cupsd prior to adding the printer, it did not.
So, sorry for the false alarm and thanks for providing this package!
christoph.gysin commented on 2020-07-20 06:56 (UTC) (edited on 2020-07-20 06:57 (UTC) by christoph.gysin)
@maggis This is interesting. I don't quite understand what fixed this for you, since the tarball at the new URL is indeed identical except for a gzip header timestamp. You can verify this by uncompressing both. The resulting tar is identical:
Can you re-install this package with the URL in the PKGBUILD, and reproduce the problem?
maggis commented on 2020-07-19 22:18 (UTC)
@christoph.gysin @araruna I've hit the same problem on an SCX-4726FN. Managed to resolve it by changing the source to https://ftp.hp.com/pub/softlib/software13/printers/SS/SL-M4580FX/uld_V1.00.39_01.17.tar.gz in PKGBUILD. Strangely, md5 and sha256 sums of both tarballs differ, but when extracting them and comparing sums of each file, all are the same.
christoph.gysin commented on 2020-07-03 07:39 (UTC)
@araruna Can you spot any differences in the installed files? I'm happy to fix this package, but I can't reproduce this with my printer.
araruna commented on 2020-07-02 22:08 (UTC)
Strangely, printing from the drivers installed from this package gives me a shitload of completely black pages (there goes my toner), with cups reporting that "/usr/lib/cups/filter/rastertospl crashed on signal 6".
On the other hand, manually installing the same (?) drivers from HP's website worked out fine...
Narisoval commented on 2020-06-01 12:30 (UTC) (edited on 2020-06-01 14:34 (UTC) by Narisoval)
Unfortunately doesn't work on Samsung SCX-4100. When I try to add printer it says 'failed to add new printer additional drivers required'.(Please someone help me. I don't want to go back to windows just because of printer)
christoph.gysin commented on 2019-10-21 12:27 (UTC)
@Thermi: Thanks, fixed.
Thermi commented on 2019-10-16 22:24 (UTC)
Please remove the executable bit from /usr/lib/udev/rules.d/60_smfp_samsung.rules
Yoppez commented on 2019-05-13 20:03 (UTC) (edited on 2019-05-13 20:03 (UTC) by Yoppez)
@liOnux I don't think I will report this to HP, both beacause I don't think that they still update "old" printer drivers (I saw that the last build is from 2017), and because I don't use the printer very much, so it's not a big problem. Thanks for the reply!
liOnux commented on 2019-05-13 19:24 (UTC)
@Yoppez These Samsung printer drivers are out of date. But you have to report this bug to HP because Samsung has stopped drivers development.
Yoppez commented on 2019-05-10 16:17 (UTC)
My Samsung CLP-325 works with cups 2.2.11-2, but it can't make double-sided printings.
Amphitryon commented on 2019-04-16 22:42 (UTC)
2.2.11-2 works on a CLX-3175.
ingo66 commented on 2019-04-16 17:47 (UTC)
@christoph.gysin My Samsung CLP-310 works with cups and libcups 2.2.11-2 from the Extra Repo.
liOnux commented on 2019-04-16 13:56 (UTC) (edited on 2019-04-16 14:02 (UTC) by liOnux)
My Samsung CLP-320 works fine with cups-2.2.11-2 from testing repo :-)
christoph.gysin commented on 2019-04-16 11:54 (UTC)
@ingo66 @aneiser @Amphitryon We have cups-2.2.11-2 in [testing], can you please test if your printers work again with this?
christoph.gysin commented on 2019-04-16 11:50 (UTC)
@Amphitryon Yes, there is still a need to patch this in the Arch package for cups. The upstream workaround won't help anyone until cups-2.2.12 is released, and Arch releases a package for it. Until then, we need to backport that fix to cups-2.2.11, or all users with these printers must manually downgrade to cups-2.2.10.
Amphitryon commented on 2019-04-16 11:31 (UTC)
@christoph.gysin But there is no need to patch this in Arch if the upstream developer, i.e. Michael Sweet, has agreed to include a work-around, at least for the time being. We just need to test the work-around. See https://github.com/apple/cups/issues/5562#issuecomment-483377904 where Michael has re-opened the bug, made a commit and re-closed it.
Much more concerning is that either PPDs or the interface to retrieve info from them are to be dropped. I have looked around the CUPS site and can't see a roadmap for where CUPS is going.
Whilst I would be pleased if Samsung update their driver I am not holding my breath. In the end I feat we may need to include an old (and therefore working) version of CUPS in the samsung-unified-driver-printer package or another AUR package that depends on and then declare it as conflicting with the official Arch package so you install one or the other.
christoph.gysin commented on 2019-04-16 04:47 (UTC)
@Amphitryon I already suggested to apply it to the cups arch package. Go vote for the bug.
Amphitryon commented on 2019-04-15 21:33 (UTC)
Check out the CUPS upstream bug again - there is now a temporary fix.
christoph.gysin commented on 2019-04-15 19:11 (UTC)
There is nothing we can do, see: https://github.com/apple/cups/issues/5562#issuecomment-483377904
I opened a bug against cups, hoping we can revert the commit at least in arch: https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/62360
Go vote for that bug!
Amphitryon commented on 2019-04-15 17:11 (UTC)
Given that the CUPS bug has been closed as a driver issue what is the way forward now? We can obviously hope that Samsung update the driver but in case that takes a long time does anyone understand enough about what michaelrsweet was saying to be able to patch the Samsung driver to work with CUPS 2.11 in the meantime?
deKay commented on 2019-04-15 15:03 (UTC) (edited on 2019-04-15 15:07 (UTC) by deKay)
Cant install it because a couple files already exist. samsung-unified-driver-printer: /usr/lib/cups/backend/smfpnetdiscovery existiert bereits im Dateisystem
samsung-unified-driver-printer: /usr/lib/cups/filter/pstosecps existiert bereits im Dateisystem
samsung-unified-driver-printer: /usr/lib/cups/filter/rastertospl existiert bereits im Dateisystem
samsung-unified-driver-scanner: /opt/samsung/scanner/share/oem.conf existiert bereits im Dateisystem
samsung-unified-driver-scanner: /usr/lib/sane/libsane-smfp.so existiert bereits im Dateisystem
samsung-unified-driver-scanner: /usr/lib/sane/libsane-smfp.so.1 existiert bereits im Dateisystem
samsung-unified-driver-scanner: /usr/lib/sane/libsane-smfp.so.1.0.1 existiert bereits im Dateisystem
samsung-unified-driver-scanner: /usr/share/locale/fr/LC_MESSAGES/sane-smfp.mo existiert bereits im Dateisystem
ingo66 commented on 2019-04-11 19:23 (UTC)
@aneiser - Puh ... thank you :)
aneiser commented on 2019-04-11 19:20 (UTC) (edited on 2019-04-11 19:40 (UTC) by aneiser)
@ingo66 I finished bisecting it and found the following commit to be the culprit:
https://github.com/apple/cups/commit/558bba72feccba755135e140c350bb34ec20986c
Reported an issue here: https://github.com/apple/cups/issues/5562 Feel free to add more information into the issue.
My printer is a Samsung CLX-3185.
ingo66 commented on 2019-04-11 18:44 (UTC) (edited on 2019-04-11 19:21 (UTC) by ingo66)
Hello,
Ok, I have tried the following:
with the result:
Was that the idea up to here?
In the INSTALL.md I read about ./configure; make; make check. I have never created a package for arch linux before. Is this even necessary for the further steps?
christoph.gysin commented on 2019-04-10 20:13 (UTC)
@ingo66 You would need to use
git bisect
and build cups after every step, and after 5-6 steps you would know exactly which commit caused it.ingo66 commented on 2019-04-10 19:00 (UTC)
Hello,
I looked at all commits between 13.01.2019 (version 2.2.10) and 24.03.2019 (version 2.2.11), but unfortunately I don't have the necessary knowledge to be able to say which one led to the current situation.
Sorry.
christoph.gysin commented on 2019-04-10 10:40 (UTC) (edited on 2019-04-10 10:41 (UTC) by christoph.gysin)
@liOnux @ingo66
This might be a regression in cups. Could you bisect the changes since v2.2.10 to see which commit caused it?
https://github.com/apple/cups/compare/v2.2.10...v2.2.11
We could then report it upstream, and ask the maintainer of the cups package to revert the commit for now.
ingo66 commented on 2019-04-09 18:55 (UTC)
Hello,
With the samsung-unified-driver 4.00.39-5 for my Samsung CLP-310 along with cups and libcups 2.2.11-1 I have a similar Error-Message by sending a print job.
After downgraded cups and libcups to 2.2.10-2 the printer prints as expected.
liOnux commented on 2019-03-29 16:35 (UTC) (edited on 2019-04-10 18:37 (UTC) by liOnux)
Hi, Since I updated cups and libcups from 2.2.10-2 to 2.2.11-1,
my Samsung CLP-320 prints this :
liOnux commented on 2018-10-25 19:14 (UTC)
Works very well (printer CLP-320), thanks
jancici commented on 2018-05-26 19:04 (UTC) (edited on 2018-05-26 19:05 (UTC) by jancici)
fix is not working on my laptop using yay
ll .cache/yay/samsung-unified-driver/src
drwxr-xr-x - jano 25 máj 8:04 uld
ll .cache/yay/samsung-unified-driver/src/uld
drwxr-xr-x - jano 25 máj 8:04 noarch
ll .cache/yay/samsung-unified-driver/src/uld/noarch
drwxr-xr-x - jano 25 máj 8:04 share
ll .cache/yay/samsung-unified-driver/src/uld/noarch/share
dr-xr-xr-x - jano 15 dec 2016 ppd
as you can see, still wrong permision on PPD directory
for update I am doing these steps:
cd .cache/yay/samsung-unified-driver
chmod +w -R src
makepkg
yay -U samsung-unified-driver-1.00.39-2-x86_64.pkg.tar.xz
christoph.gysin commented on 2018-05-26 09:08 (UTC)
@edacval Thanks, fixed.
jancici commented on 2018-05-25 18:14 (UTC) (edited on 2018-05-25 18:15 (UTC) by jancici)
@christoph.gysin yes, during makepkg there was same problem, but package was created so I could install with yay
@edacval thanks
edacval commented on 2018-05-25 08:26 (UTC)
same problem as @jancici, fixed with https://paste.ee/p/vACOu
christoph.gysin commented on 2018-05-25 06:50 (UTC)
@jancici Can you reproduce that with
makepkg
?jancici commented on 2018-05-25 06:07 (UTC)
during update with YAY I am getting error messages, see below, so I change permisions then build manually with makepkg and install with yay -Syu --norebuild
==> Validating source files with sha512sums... uld_V1.00.39_01.17.tar.gz ... Passed xerox_mfp-smfp.conf ... Passed ==> Cleaning up... ==> Making package: samsung-unified-driver 1.00.39-1 (Pi máj 25 08:04:13 CEST 2018) ==> Checking runtime dependencies... ==> Checking buildtime dependencies... ==> Retrieving sources... -> Found uld_V1.00.39_01.17.tar.gz -> Found xerox_mfp-smfp.conf ==> Validating source files with sha512sums... uld_V1.00.39_01.17.tar.gz ... Passed xerox_mfp-smfp.conf ... Passed ==> Removing existing $srcdir/ directory... ==> Extracting sources... -> Extracting uld_V1.00.39_01.17.tar.gz with bsdtar ==> Sources are ready. ==> Cleaning up... rm: cannot remove '/home/jano/.cache/yay/samsung-unified-driver/src/uld/noarch/share/ppd/Samsung_M403x_Series.ppd': Permission denied rm: cannot remove '/home/jano/.cache/yay/samsung-unified-driver/src/uld/noarch/share/ppd/Samsung_SCX-470x_Series.ppd': Permission denied rm: cannot remove '/home/jano/.cache/yay/samsung-unified-driver/src/uld/noarch/share/ppd/Samsung_ML-1865W_Series.ppd': Permission denied rm: cannot remove '/home/jano/.cache/yay/samsung-unified-driver/src/uld/noarch/share/ppd/Samsung_CLX-6200_Series.ppd': Permission denied rm: cannot remove '/home/jano/.cache/yay/samsung-unified-driver/src/uld/noarch/share/ppd/Samsung_CLP-350_Series.ppd': Permission denied rm: cannot remove '/home/jano/.cache/yay/samsung-unified-driver/src/uld/noarch/share/ppd/Samsung_C420_Series.ppd': Permission denied rm: cannot remove '/home/jano/.cache/yay/samsung-unified-driver/src/uld/noarch/share/ppd/Samsung_SCX-6x55_Series.ppd': Permission denied
coldspark commented on 2018-03-12 08:43 (UTC)
Print and platen glass scan work, but when I try an ADF scan the paper gets stuck on my SCX3400. ADF works with the iPhone app, so it must be a linux problem. It used to work with an earlier version, but it doesn't seem to be available anymore. Is anyone working on this?
christoph.gysin commented on 2018-03-03 11:51 (UTC)
@queenmedley: You might want to ask on the arch-general mailinglist or the forums for help configuring your scanner.
queenmedley commented on 2018-02-20 10:14 (UTC)
compile has sucessed, but not see scansouce icon, so can't use ADF scan . Any solution?
k3a commented on 2017-08-20 18:33 (UTC) (edited on 2017-08-20 18:45 (UTC) by k3a)
christoph.gysin commented on 2017-08-04 17:43 (UTC)
radar_wiekszy commented on 2017-08-03 22:50 (UTC)
k3a commented on 2017-05-28 20:58 (UTC) (edited on 2017-05-28 21:03 (UTC) by k3a)
Moo-Crumpus commented on 2017-03-10 12:07 (UTC)
christoph.gysin commented on 2017-03-04 10:17 (UTC)
Moo-Crumpus commented on 2017-03-04 08:09 (UTC)
christoph.gysin commented on 2017-02-09 13:08 (UTC)
mmozeiko commented on 2017-02-08 20:20 (UTC)
christoph.gysin commented on 2017-01-24 19:54 (UTC)
tchernomax commented on 2016-12-17 15:28 (UTC)
nicoulaj commented on 2016-12-12 20:30 (UTC) (edited on 2016-12-12 20:32 (UTC) by nicoulaj)
mrzeznicki commented on 2016-04-15 21:41 (UTC)
luuuciano commented on 2016-03-14 15:55 (UTC)
christoph.gysin commented on 2016-03-13 20:18 (UTC)
luuuciano commented on 2016-03-13 17:47 (UTC)
christoph.gysin commented on 2016-03-13 09:55 (UTC)
afwlehmann commented on 2016-01-22 17:59 (UTC)
christoph.gysin commented on 2015-12-18 06:09 (UTC)
emilio commented on 2015-12-18 03:02 (UTC)
emilio commented on 2015-12-18 02:52 (UTC)
christoph.gysin commented on 2015-12-17 19:36 (UTC)
bijan commented on 2015-12-17 16:02 (UTC)
Steltie commented on 2015-12-04 09:54 (UTC)
lcneves commented on 2015-10-25 18:16 (UTC)
novica commented on 2015-09-20 12:10 (UTC)
gyan000 commented on 2015-06-02 08:28 (UTC)
skydesigner commented on 2015-05-17 10:37 (UTC)
tuxitop commented on 2015-05-15 18:40 (UTC)
luuuciano commented on 2015-05-11 19:01 (UTC)
ptb commented on 2015-05-11 15:56 (UTC)
luuuciano commented on 2015-05-11 15:25 (UTC)
forivall commented on 2015-05-08 23:13 (UTC)
Gilrain commented on 2015-05-05 18:55 (UTC)
skydesigner commented on 2015-05-05 18:43 (UTC)
mrzeznicki commented on 2015-05-04 23:01 (UTC)
kallisti5 commented on 2015-05-02 20:39 (UTC)
duvel71 commented on 2015-01-18 18:00 (UTC)
hschletz commented on 2015-01-16 10:34 (UTC)
hschletz commented on 2015-01-14 17:22 (UTC)
isaac914 commented on 2014-12-04 08:12 (UTC)
blablubb1234 commented on 2014-11-24 10:53 (UTC)
neven commented on 2014-10-13 22:32 (UTC)
AJSlye commented on 2014-10-13 22:11 (UTC)
bakgwailo commented on 2014-06-18 20:32 (UTC)
bakgwailo commented on 2014-06-18 20:29 (UTC)
ptb commented on 2014-06-18 20:18 (UTC)
bakgwailo commented on 2014-06-18 20:08 (UTC)
lybin commented on 2014-06-10 10:14 (UTC)
ptb commented on 2014-05-14 17:40 (UTC)
Dycius commented on 2014-05-14 17:08 (UTC)
I-sty commented on 2014-04-15 11:39 (UTC)
ptb commented on 2014-04-14 18:52 (UTC)
I-sty commented on 2014-04-14 18:08 (UTC)
ptb commented on 2014-03-26 20:01 (UTC)
mav commented on 2014-03-23 10:00 (UTC)
DaveCode commented on 2014-03-22 02:03 (UTC)
ptb commented on 2014-03-07 22:14 (UTC)
mike.cloaked commented on 2014-03-07 22:04 (UTC)
dylanbr commented on 2014-03-05 13:20 (UTC)
jose1711 commented on 2014-02-10 12:36 (UTC)
wombalton commented on 2013-12-27 15:08 (UTC)
jose1711 commented on 2013-07-06 09:48 (UTC)
commented on 2013-07-06 07:23 (UTC)
wombalton commented on 2013-06-27 21:40 (UTC)
ptb commented on 2013-06-27 18:29 (UTC)
stas commented on 2013-06-26 21:50 (UTC)
jose1711 commented on 2013-06-05 16:00 (UTC)
commented on 2013-06-03 13:06 (UTC)
hgabreu commented on 2013-06-03 12:54 (UTC)
ptb commented on 2013-05-31 22:19 (UTC)
Ownaginatious commented on 2013-05-31 21:36 (UTC)
juurakki commented on 2013-05-17 14:11 (UTC)
commented on 2013-05-12 08:09 (UTC)
ptb commented on 2013-05-11 11:23 (UTC)
bct commented on 2013-05-08 17:11 (UTC)
mrohnstock commented on 2013-03-13 17:49 (UTC)
I-sty commented on 2013-02-19 19:11 (UTC)
jyc commented on 2013-01-08 05:44 (UTC)
TheWretched commented on 2012-12-06 23:34 (UTC)
ptb commented on 2012-10-26 04:44 (UTC)
syne commented on 2012-10-26 00:48 (UTC)
solarwind commented on 2012-10-25 17:45 (UTC)
commented on 2012-10-11 11:26 (UTC)
ptb commented on 2012-10-09 15:15 (UTC)
commented on 2012-10-09 13:14 (UTC)
commented on 2012-09-06 14:14 (UTC)
falmp commented on 2012-07-02 20:32 (UTC)
ptb commented on 2012-07-02 19:10 (UTC)
falmp commented on 2012-07-02 18:02 (UTC)
commented on 2012-06-18 17:55 (UTC)
ptb commented on 2012-06-10 22:55 (UTC)
commented on 2012-05-31 05:09 (UTC)
commented on 2011-08-26 19:24 (UTC)
DL0 commented on 2011-08-14 04:54 (UTC)
commented on 2011-07-31 19:01 (UTC)