Search Criteria
Package Details: scid_vs_pc 4.25-2
Package Actions
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/scid_vs_pc.git (read-only, click to copy) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | scid_vs_pc |
| Description: | Shane's Chess Information Database |
| Upstream URL: | http://scidvspc.sourceforge.net/ |
| Keywords: | chess database games |
| Licenses: | GPL2 |
| Conflicts: | scid |
| Submitter: | archtux |
| Maintainer: | Morn (bulletmark, zyli, fanisg, makret, controller) |
| Last Packager: | bulletmark |
| Votes: | 40 |
| Popularity: | 0.000001 |
| First Submitted: | 2010-12-11 20:45 (UTC) |
| Last Updated: | 2024-06-02 03:23 (UTC) |
Dependencies (4)
- tk (tk-fossilAUR)
- zlib (zlib-ng-compat-gitAUR, zlib-gitAUR, zlib-ng-compat)
- snackAUR (optional)
- tdomAUR (optional)
Required by (4)
- asmfish-git (optional)
- ethereal-git (optional)
- minnow-git (optional)
- xiphos-chess-git (optional)
Latest Comments
1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »
Tyrin.price commented on 2024-06-02 12:06 (UTC) (edited on 2024-06-02 12:08 (UTC) by Tyrin.price)
Thanks, @bulletmark ... It works now. I got this in my email from the scid-vs-pc mailing list pretty much confirming that they made changes to the tarball without changing the version:
Steve A stevenaaus@gmail.com via lists.sourceforge.net Attachments 9:53 AM (2 hours ago) to scidvspc-users
Ok, the final (hopefully) 4.25 binaries are up
bulletmark commented on 2024-06-02 03:28 (UTC)
@Tyrin.price, yes it appears the scid_vs_pc developers have once again changed the tar file but not the version. I have updated the checksum with 4.25-2 to fix this.
Tyrin.price commented on 2024-06-02 02:33 (UTC)
==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
error: failed to download sources for 'scid_vs_pc-4.25-1':
error: packages failed to build: scid_vs_pc-4.25-1
bulletmark commented on 2023-06-07 03:10 (UTC)
I have made another update 4.24-3 which now includes the
pkgrelin the download file name. So whenever thepkgrelgets bumped this will force a new file to be downloaded, and thus avoid this checksum problem with any old cached file.bulletmark commented on 2023-06-07 01:37 (UTC)
@SleepyMario, make sure you use the current version 4.24-2 and make sure you delete any cached
scid_vs_pc-4.24.tgzas the SCID developers one again released a new update but used the same version number.SleepyMario commented on 2023-06-07 01:27 (UTC) (edited on 2023-06-07 01:27 (UTC) by SleepyMario)
Checksum Error:
==> Validating source files with md5sums... scid_vs_pc-4.24.tgz ... FAILED
tdtooke commented on 2022-09-22 02:18 (UTC)
Disregard my last. Rookie mistake. I just put the one 'SKIP' but forgot to include the md5sums for all the other stuff in sources like in this package. Oops.
tdtooke commented on 2022-09-21 07:50 (UTC)
Just a question for the maintainer. I modified your pkgbuild to build the latest from SVN. My question is how do I get it to skip integrity checks. I know I can do makepkg --skipinteg but I want it in the pkgbuild so I can share it here. I tried md5sums=('SKIP') immediately after the sources but that didn't work.
bulletmark commented on 2019-04-28 10:15 (UTC)
Yes, we have to put up with this crazy practice where the upstream developers release new changes in the same version file(!). I have updated the md5sum.
1 2 3 4 5 6 Next › Last »