Package Details: scid_vs_pc 4.19-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/scid_vs_pc.git (read-only)
Package Base: scid_vs_pc
Description: Shane's Chess Information Database
Upstream URL: http://scidvspc.sourceforge.net/
Keywords: chess database games
Licenses: GPL2
Conflicts: scid
Submitter: archtux
Maintainer: Morn (bulletmark, zyli, fanisg)
Last Packager: Morn
Votes: 27
Popularity: 0.006719
First Submitted: 2010-12-11 20:45
Last Updated: 2018-09-09 10:03

Dependencies (3)

Required by (4)

Sources (5)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 4 5 Next › Last »

Morn commented on 2018-09-09 10:04

@bruno: Yes, it works fine.

bruno.unna commented on 2018-09-09 09:45

Package tdom-git doesn't even exist. Does someone here know if it works with tdom?

Morn commented on 2017-09-04 14:06

@infinigon: You are right, that looks wrong. This is an old PKGBUILD, so who knows why it was that way. Probably cut-and-paste gone wrong...

Unfortunately it seems that merely upgrading the package does not change the existing file system permission to 755, you have to uninstall and reinstall.

infinigon commented on 2017-09-04 13:08

Any reason why directory /usr/share/fonts/truetype/Scid is installed with 644 permissions, not 755? That makes it so that users can't access the font files...

Morn commented on 2017-01-25 11:34

@apetresc: The checksum is the same as before for me.

apetresc commented on 2017-01-25 01:28

Just a ping that the checksum is presumably out of date again - the validity check is failing :)

Morn commented on 2016-11-01 21:53

@naund: Packages in the base-devel group such as make are not included in makedepends, see https://wiki.archlinux.org/index.php/PKGBUILD#depends

naund commented on 2016-11-01 21:17

make is required for building this package. Please add it to makedepends.

Morn commented on 2016-10-31 11:01

I've made all of you co-maintainers; obviously we need more manpower to deal with these constant source package updates. The temptation to set the checksum to SKIP is certainly growing. :-)

bulletmark commented on 2016-10-26 23:07

@Morn, I have never seen any project/person publish a versioned tar file and then occasionally update the contents over a period but keep the same version name. It's just something that never should be done. I or anybody else would have made the same "mistake" as you.