Package Details: scrcpy 1.5-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only)
Package Base: scrcpy
Description: Display and control your Android device
Upstream URL:
Licenses: Apache
Submitter: nvllsvm
Maintainer: nvllsvm
Last Packager: nvllsvm
Votes: 20
Popularity: 2.375439
First Submitted: 2018-03-09 06:06
Last Updated: 2018-11-12 00:45

Latest Comments

capoeira commented on 2018-06-20 17:45

[antergos@maquina ~]$ scrcpy exec: No such file or directory ERROR: "adb push" returned with value 1

nvllsvm commented on 2018-06-19 23:43

@MindfulConsumer - cannot replicate your issue. Works fine on my OnePlus 3T running LineageOS 15.1

MindfulConsumer commented on 2018-06-16 09:42

So wished this would work but I get "Invalid return value 0 for stream protocol" - I'm reading in the comments [url=]here[/url] it might be an Arch problem..

"looks like it is caused by a 'wrong backported ffmpeg', so it might be arch related."

parkerlreed commented on 2018-03-19 14:35

adb also resides in android-tools from the official repos.

nvllsvm commented on 2018-03-17 15:28

@seankhliao - should be fixed now.

seankhliao commented on 2018-03-17 04:23

I'm getting failed sha256sum validation for scr-server.jar?

nvllsvm commented on 2018-03-09 19:43

Ran into permission issues when using the SDK provided by android-sdk. Ended up switching to the prebuilt scrcpy-server.jar from scrcpy's GitHub. This eliminates the need to have the full SDK installed and $ANDROID_HOME set.

android-sdk-platform-tools was added as an optdepend. It is necessary to run scrcpy only if adb is not already installed (ex. through Android Studio).

MCMic commented on 2018-03-09 16:30

Maybe android-sdk should be in depend then? Or optdepend at least.

BrianAllred commented on 2018-03-09 15:58

Why does this rely on Java 8? And I'm also getting the $ANDROID_HOME issue.

Edit: Installing android-sdk fixed my $ANDROID_HOME issue.

MCMic commented on 2018-03-09 14:04

I get "Cannot determine $ANDROID_HOME", reading the PKGBUILD it seems I need to but something in ~/.android/sdk ? Could you change the message for something clearer which explains what is expected by the package (or maybe a link to documentation if the explanation is too long)