Search Criteria
Package Details: sh-elf-binutils-casio 2.37-6
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/sh-elf-binutils-casio.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | sh-elf-binutils-casio |
Description: | GNU binary utilities for the Casio calculators SuperH processors. |
Upstream URL: | https://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/ |
Licenses: | GPL |
Submitter: | Eldeberen |
Maintainer: | None |
Last Packager: | Eldeberen |
Votes: | 1 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2020-05-07 22:30 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2021-11-06 20:59 (UTC) |
Dependencies (4)
- binutils
- flex (flex-gitAUR)
- zlib (zlib-ng-compat-gitAUR, zlib-gitAUR, zlib-ng-compatAUR)
- gcc (gcc-gitAUR, gccrs-gitAUR, gcc11AUR, gcc-snapshotAUR) (make)
Latest Comments
Eldeberen commented on 2021-07-15 07:07 (UTC)
Yes, the chroot is up-to-date. I suppose you have the line
CPPFLAGS="-D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2"
in your makepkg.conf, which is not the case in a clean chroot. I pushed a patch that disable it at build, should be better now. :)parkerlreed commented on 2021-07-14 23:03 (UTC)
Is the chroot up to date? I had to use a patch to get it compiled. I don't see how it would have worked on clean without it.
https://github.com/Manawyrm/fxIP/issues/3#issuecomment-879957723
Eldeberen commented on 2021-07-14 22:40 (UTC) (edited on 2021-07-14 23:02 (UTC) by Eldeberen)
Hi, thank you for your report. Did you install the base-devel group? I just built the package in a clean chroot and everything went fine. It seems there are some broken dependencies on your side.
If you were talking about sh-elf-gcc-casio, there was indeed a bug in the PKGBUILD. I may have build the package before releasing the breaking change, my bad >_> I pushed a fix, should be ok now.
parkerlreed commented on 2021-07-14 03:22 (UTC)
Errors out