Package Details: sherlock-git r2084.ab2f678-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/sherlock-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: sherlock-git
Description: Hunt down social media accounts by username across social networks
Upstream URL: https://github.com/sherlock-project/sherlock
Keywords: accounts osint penetration-testing security social-media username
Licenses: MIT
Submitter: peeweep
Maintainer: randomnobody
Last Packager: randomnobody
Votes: 9
Popularity: 0.000457
First Submitted: 2019-10-05 00:58 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2023-04-13 01:48 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

randomnobody commented on 2023-04-13 01:48 (UTC)

@iamawacko thanks for the tip

iamawacko commented on 2023-03-03 06:07 (UTC)

You should remove the soup dependencies and python-lxml, per https://github.com/sherlock-project/sherlock/commit/c7344ad3fcc29c2ab61b99f99c1a76d127f2d909. It looks like python-openpyxl should also be added to the dependency list.

randomnobody commented on 2022-07-31 03:44 (UTC) (edited on 2022-07-31 03:58 (UTC) by randomnobody)

@jonas-w I'm not sure what the exact solution is. We have two projects with the same name. There's no immediate problems because sherlock-project/sherlock does not have stable versioned releases so there likely will only ever been a git-style AUR PKGBUILD for it.

While it might be lame to appeal to popularity, sherlock-project/sherlock has 34.4k GitHub stars and 6 AUR votes vs. ergius02/Sherlock's 29 stars and 0 AUR votes. Additionally ergius02/Sherlock hasn't had a commit in over a year with 3 total contributors, while sherlock-project/sherlock had a commit 5 days ago with 160 total contributors. This tells me if one AUR package is going to change their name it should be ergius02/Sherlock since the most probable assumption for an AUR package called "sherlock" would be for sherlock-project/sherlock.

I've made a post on the sherlock AUR package requesting a name change: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sherlock#comment-876004

jonas-w commented on 2022-07-26 14:56 (UTC)

as @rhysperry111 stated it conflicts with the "sherlock" package.

Also the sherlock package is a duplicate of "elementary-sherlock" or vice verca.

randomnobody commented on 2022-07-12 01:56 (UTC)

Adopted this because orphaned packages scare me. Removed conflict/provides as per rhysperry111 and added python-pandas as per Musse/nbvcxz.

rhysperry111 commented on 2022-07-09 19:14 (UTC) (edited on 2022-07-09 19:15 (UTC) by rhysperry111)

You should probably remove the provides and conflicts for sherlock, as the package sherlock in the AUR is actually an entirely different project.

Maybe consider messaging the maintainer of sherlock and deciding if one of you wants to change the base name of either of your packages in order to avoid confusion and allow for more consistent package naming if a binary for this project comes.

nbvcxz commented on 2022-07-07 19:19 (UTC) (edited on 2022-07-07 19:19 (UTC) by nbvcxz)

python-pandas should be added as a runtime dependency.

+1

Musse commented on 2022-06-28 10:35 (UTC)

python-pandas should be added as a runtime dependency.

konradybcio commented on 2021-04-21 20:24 (UTC)

Currently the /usr/bin/sherlock entry points to

/usr/share/sherlock/sherlock.py

whereas the program has moved to

/usr/share/sherlock/sherlock/sherlock.py

1 2 Next › Last »