Package Details: sherlock-git r2442.7e87a88-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/sherlock-git.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: sherlock-git
Description: Hunt down social media accounts by username across social networks
Upstream URL: https://github.com/sherlock-project/sherlock
Keywords: accounts osint penetration-testing security social-media username
Licenses: MIT
Submitter: peeweep
Maintainer: iamawacko
Last Packager: iamawacko
Votes: 9
Popularity: 0.44
First Submitted: 2019-10-05 00:58 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-07-30 01:00 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

jvybihal commented on 2024-07-24 07:07 (UTC)

Please fix the pkgver. This is not how it is supposed to be.

iamawacko commented on 2024-07-08 00:33 (UTC)

Thanks for pointing that out. I was offline for a few days, sorry for the delay.

malmerri commented on 2024-07-03 12:02 (UTC) (edited on 2024-07-03 12:04 (UTC) by malmerri)

Hi thanks for your work,

The package currently fails to build in a clean chroot because you need to add 'python-poetry-core' to the list of make depends.

Thanks again.

malmerri commented on 2024-06-29 07:20 (UTC)

Hi this fails to build due to a change in upstream, please see this issue: https://github.com/sherlock-project/sherlock/issues/2168

randomnobody commented on 2024-06-01 08:20 (UTC)

@ReturnOfTheLast I orphan'd the package. I don't use this software enough to want to maintain the PKGBUILD.

ReturnOfTheLast commented on 2024-05-16 06:54 (UTC)

README.md has been moved into docs/ on the git repo, this causes the install on line 39 of the PKGBUILD to fail.

randomnobody commented on 2023-04-13 01:48 (UTC)

@iamawacko thanks for the tip

iamawacko commented on 2023-03-03 06:07 (UTC)

You should remove the soup dependencies and python-lxml, per https://github.com/sherlock-project/sherlock/commit/c7344ad3fcc29c2ab61b99f99c1a76d127f2d909. It looks like python-openpyxl should also be added to the dependency list.

randomnobody commented on 2022-07-31 03:44 (UTC) (edited on 2022-07-31 03:58 (UTC) by randomnobody)

@jonas-w I'm not sure what the exact solution is. We have two projects with the same name. There's no immediate problems because sherlock-project/sherlock does not have stable versioned releases so there likely will only ever been a git-style AUR PKGBUILD for it.

While it might be lame to appeal to popularity, sherlock-project/sherlock has 34.4k GitHub stars and 6 AUR votes vs. ergius02/Sherlock's 29 stars and 0 AUR votes. Additionally ergius02/Sherlock hasn't had a commit in over a year with 3 total contributors, while sherlock-project/sherlock had a commit 5 days ago with 160 total contributors. This tells me if one AUR package is going to change their name it should be ergius02/Sherlock since the most probable assumption for an AUR package called "sherlock" would be for sherlock-project/sherlock.

I've made a post on the sherlock AUR package requesting a name change: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/sherlock#comment-876004

jonas-w commented on 2022-07-26 14:56 (UTC)

as @rhysperry111 stated it conflicts with the "sherlock" package.

Also the sherlock package is a duplicate of "elementary-sherlock" or vice verca.

1 2 Next › Last »