Package Details: simp_le-git 1:0.18.1.r0.g7138ef6-1

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: simp_le-git
Description: Simple Let's Encrypt client.
Upstream URL:
Keywords: certificate letsencrypt
Licenses: GPL
Conflicts: simp_le
Provides: simp_le
Submitter: roentgen
Maintainer: klemens
Last Packager: klemens
Votes: 2
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2015-12-05 16:39
Last Updated: 2021-01-10 16:29

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

klemens commented on 2020-01-01 16:56

@xrchz: Fixed, from now on there should be much less breakage, as there is no longer an upper version bound on python-acme.

xrchz commented on 2019-12-27 18:18

The package is again broken since commit 4471fd5a994ca4213dc804713abd1187e4cab90a because the patch doesn't apply.

klemens commented on 2019-06-27 21:43

Version 0.15 includes some breaking changes:

Only ACME v2 endpoints are supported from now on. The -f feature to use your own file structure was removed and you now need to also save the account_reg.json file using -f account_reg.json.

klemens commented on 2018-08-14 18:55

Fixed, thanks for reporting!

thor77 commented on 2018-08-14 18:48

This package is broken since commit bbacb1dc7b10b9b4e269c86ce27b69700658fbe6, because the patch-file doesn't apply successfully anymore.

klemens commented on 2017-06-19 18:23

This package now uses zenhack's fork, as the original project has not been updated for over a year.

kuba commented on 2016-04-24 10:19

There is nothing contradicting in #70.

Installation procedure *from source* has always been the same: virtualenv. The point of virtualenv is not to mix PyPI and system packages.

However, if you're packaging for distro, i.e. creating a new system package, then you obviously don't need virtualenv as it contradicts the idea I set out above...

roentgen commented on 2016-04-19 16:57

@kuba Looks to me you contradict yourself. You state something else in the linked github issue (#70). Is there an updated installation procedure? I can't find anything on the github wiki.

kuba commented on 2016-04-17 21:03

Disclaimer: upstream author over here

You don't have to support "virtualenv crap", and for distro packaging you actually shouldn't...

roentgen commented on 2016-01-20 05:01

I will disown this package. I personally don't like to support this virtualenv crap where the dev gets to embed its own distro inside a simple package.