Search Criteria
Package Details: simplex-desktop-bin 6.1.1-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/simplex-desktop-bin.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | simplex-desktop-bin |
Description: | SimpleX Chat, the first messaging network operating without user identifiers of any kind (pre-compiled) |
Upstream URL: | https://simplex.chat/ |
Keywords: | chat simplex |
Licenses: | AGPL-3.0-or-later |
Submitter: | Nep_Nep |
Maintainer: | matthewq337 (jakecrow75643) |
Last Packager: | matthewq337 |
Votes: | 8 |
Popularity: | 0.54 |
First Submitted: | 2024-05-26 01:58 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2024-10-29 20:14 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
Spheerys commented on 2024-12-30 12:16 (UTC)
This outdated desktop version can't be shared anymore with smartphone app 6.2 because of the version number.
fiberdistraction commented on 2024-10-13 20:27 (UTC) (edited on 2024-10-13 20:27 (UTC) by fiberdistraction)
I can't play videos with this package. I get this traceback: https://paste.rs/3H1av (it's longer than 5000 characters). If I had to guess, I'd say this has to do with the objcopy stuff. I had to resort to the AppImage.
Smae commented on 2024-10-06 20:59 (UTC)
@kseistrup re PS: The same way how the original uploader can be arbitrarily banned for uploading simplex-bin. :D, they did nothing else but upload the aur package and would have continued maintaining it.
kseistrup commented on 2024-08-16 19:17 (UTC)
@matthewq337 I understand. In that case I can say upfront I will at most be contributing to the stable releases since I do not really use the desktop version of SimpleX, and I won't be downloading the frequent pre-releases to see if they work.
PS: How come arbitrary AUR users can be made co-maintainers without having to actively say yes to take on the responsibility? That's a surprise to me.
matthewq337 commented on 2024-08-16 18:41 (UTC)
@kseistrup if it works
kseistrup commented on 2024-08-16 18:40 (UTC)
Since I have apparently been made co-maintainer, I'd like to know: Are "we" publishing pre-releases? As far as I can see the latest release is v6.0.0. V6.0.1 is still tagged as "pre-release".
kseistrup commented on 2024-08-16 18:00 (UTC)
The package builds now (6.0.1-1). However, the
PKGBUILD
has two lines withsha256sums=(…)
. Only the last of these lines are correct:The one that starts with
sha256sums=('dd2b106…
is incorrect and should be deleted.IMHO, rather than calculating the digests ourselves, a wiser path would be to use the
sha512sums
published on the release page.matthewq337 commented on 2024-08-16 17:57 (UTC)
fixed @jakecrow75643
jakecrow75643 commented on 2024-08-16 04:57 (UTC)
I get this error message during installation. ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check!
1 2 Next › Last »