I have just merged slock-hg into this package; there was no point to keep a package that does not build around - thanks for letting me know. And to answer your question I'm happy to keep maintaining slock-git.
Search Criteria
Package Details: slock-git 20160923.a98fba8-1
| Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/slock-git.git (read-only) |
|---|---|
| Package Base: | slock-git |
| Description: | Simple X display locker |
| Upstream URL: | http://tools.suckless.org/slock |
| Licenses: | |
| Conflicts: | |
| Provides: | |
| Submitter: | vesath |
| Maintainer: | vesath |
| Last Packager: | vesath |
| Votes: | 23 |
| Popularity: | 0.479064 |
| First Submitted: | 2012-12-02 07:22 |
| Last Updated: | 2016-09-24 23:09 |
Dependencies (2)
- libxrandr (libxrandr-git)
- git (git-git) (make)
Required by (1)
- xfce4-session-git (requires slock) (optional)
Sources (1)
Latest Comments
vesath commented on 2013-03-06 09:30
Anonymous comment on 2013-03-06 09:19
Hi, I made a request on the aur-general mailing list, see https://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2013-March/022346.html , to remove or merge every hg package for suckless projects, because suckless switched to git.
Since your package doesn't build anymore, it should be merged with slock-git, created by vesath. You two should come to an agreement, who will continue maintaining slock-git after the merging. In that case I think it would be polite if vesath gets to do it, because he created slock-git. In case he's ok with you being the new maintainer, that's ok as well. If none of you two want to do it, I'll adopt it.
Please leave a comment here or on the mailing list about your point of view on this.
Thanks!