Package Details: softmaker-office-2024-bin 1214-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/softmaker-office-2024-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: softmaker-office-2024-bin
Description: Proprietary office suite; word processing, spreadsheets, presentations
Upstream URL: https://www.softmaker.com
Licenses: LicenseRef-custom
Submitter: WorMzy
Maintainer: WorMzy
Last Packager: WorMzy
Votes: 5
Popularity: 1.29
First Submitted: 2023-05-07 00:30 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-05-26 21:30 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 3 Next › Last »

killajoe commented on 2024-06-30 09:28 (UTC)

Yes indeed, all back in "word-perfect" for now ;) B.T.W. thank you https://aur.archlinux.org/account/WorMzy for maintaining this!

Magnethelm commented on 2024-06-29 14:31 (UTC)

Works perfect! Thanks!

DenalB commented on 2024-05-27 13:21 (UTC)

Correct. The new version works great without any workaround. :-)

WorMzy commented on 2024-05-27 12:51 (UTC)

Good point, however the workaround should no longer be required with Service Pack 1214, for either version.

killajoe commented on 2024-05-27 12:29 (UTC)

unshare -r -n textmaker24 in case for this AUR build (non-NX)

WorMzy commented on 2024-05-14 18:51 (UTC)

Thanks for sharing, satirebird, I've pinned your comment until this is fixed upstream.

userfriendly commented on 2024-05-14 18:49 (UTC) (edited on 2024-05-14 18:51 (UTC) by userfriendly)

@satirebird: Thanks, this workaround works :-) - in my case: unshare -r -n textmaker24

satirebird commented on 2024-05-14 14:33 (UTC)

softmaker can be started by disable the network for the process. It works for me:

unshare -r -n textmakernx

or

unshare -r -n planmakernx

panman commented on 2024-05-09 07:25 (UTC) (edited on 2024-05-09 07:38 (UTC) by panman)

@galvez_65 Thank you for the solution. I'm sure it will work, but I am not really willing to mess with my system, as I'm not such a technical savvy to understand the solution. Given what you found and how you solved it, what I'm thinking is that the issue may not be with Softmaker Office itself, but with openssl. Maybe reporting an issue here is worth it: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/issues Or, could it be the way the openssl is packaged under Arch Linux, and the maintainer needs to be notified?