Search Criteria
Package Details: solo-python 0.0.30-2
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/solo-python.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | solo-python |
Description: | Tools and Python library for SoloKeys. |
Upstream URL: | https://github.com/solokeys/solo-python |
Licenses: | MIT, Apache |
Submitter: | mutantmonkey |
Maintainer: | mutantmonkey |
Last Packager: | mutantmonkey |
Votes: | 7 |
Popularity: | 0.007255 |
First Submitted: | 2019-04-01 06:56 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2021-12-17 05:50 (UTC) |
Latest Comments
wuxxin commented on 2022-04-25 14:12 (UTC)
hi, i created a new aur package (solo1) with the updated (0.1.1) source from https://github.com/solokeys/solo1-cli
blueman commented on 2022-04-21 19:18 (UTC)
Hello mutantmonkey, can you please update this package as advised by nickray? I think
solo1-cli
would be a suitable name.nickray commented on 2022-03-08 12:10 (UTC) (edited on 2022-03-08 12:12 (UTC) by nickray)
Hey, I renamed the repo to https://github.com/solokeys/solo1-cli, the PyPi name to
solo1
, the binary tosolo1
(butsolo
remains an alias). Version 0.1.1 ofsolo-python
is now a dummy package pulling insolo1
.Ideally, this AUR package would be replaced by one called
solo1
(presuming this is mostly used as a CLI, not as a Python library).mutantmonkey commented on 2021-11-13 21:20 (UTC) (edited on 2021-11-13 21:21 (UTC) by mutantmonkey)
Just to be clear, the
pip
command in theinstall
function just installs the wheel file that is built usingflit
in thebuild
function. This is not a binary package.jonathon commented on 2021-11-13 14:02 (UTC)
I put together a PKGBUILD for
solo-python-git
that uses the upstream source rather thanpip
. Have a look, and feel free to adopt any parts that are useful!fluix commented on 2021-04-09 22:40 (UTC) (edited on 2021-04-09 22:40 (UTC) by fluix)
The issue that @billypilgrim pointer out is because python-solo request the Python package fido2 in version 0.8.1 (fido2~=0.8.1) not the newer 0.9 version.
billypilgrim commented on 2021-04-01 13:42 (UTC)
I'm currently getting the following error every time I try to run the solo program:
mutantmonkey commented on 2021-03-27 21:45 (UTC)
@Arlas Updated, thanks for the heads up. It looks like the new python-flit package in community does not install into /usr/bin.
@alium Upstream builds this package using flit (see the upstream Makefile). I understand that additional make dependencies are a concern, but I do not really have the desire or time to maintain a separate build process from upstream. If you have any particular suggestions for how I can better adhere to the Arch packaging guidelines without changing the build process, I'd be happy to adopt them.
alium commented on 2021-03-27 10:53 (UTC) (edited on 2021-03-27 10:53 (UTC) by alium)
hi, consider please switch to archlinux packaging standard, see https://raw.githubusercontent.com/alium/share/master/PKGBUILD
you can upload solo script just here in AUR
Arlas commented on 2021-03-27 09:20 (UTC) (edited on 2021-03-27 09:21 (UTC) by Arlas)
Hello!
You are using flit in a bash environment. But python-flit is installed in python environment and not in bash.
Can you replace
flit build --format wheel
withpython -m flit build --format wheel
maybe? This worked for menickray commented on 2020-05-19 21:36 (UTC)
Hey mutantmonkey, thanks a lot for creating/maintaining this!
windy commented on 2020-01-10 18:14 (UTC)
Would it be possible to add the changes of pull request #47 as a patch to this PKGBUILD until the issue with fido2 is resolved?
elimik31 commented on 2019-12-16 14:03 (UTC)
Updating to
0.0.20-1
results in the error messageThis is an upstream issue: https://github.com/solokeys/solo-python/issues/49 Here an open PR that should fix it: https://github.com/solokeys/solo-python/pull/47