Package Details: solo-python 0.0.30-2

Git Clone URL: (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: solo-python
Description: Tools and Python library for SoloKeys.
Upstream URL:
Licenses: MIT, Apache
Submitter: mutantmonkey
Maintainer: None
Last Packager: mutantmonkey
Votes: 7
Popularity: 0.004912
First Submitted: 2019-04-01 06:56 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2021-12-17 05:50 (UTC)

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

wuxxin commented on 2022-04-25 14:12 (UTC)

hi, i created a new aur package (solo1) with the updated (0.1.1) source from

blueman commented on 2022-04-21 19:18 (UTC)

Hello mutantmonkey, can you please update this package as advised by nickray? I think solo1-cli would be a suitable name.

nickray commented on 2022-03-08 12:10 (UTC) (edited on 2022-03-08 12:12 (UTC) by nickray)

Hey, I renamed the repo to, the PyPi name to solo1, the binary to solo1 (but solo remains an alias). Version 0.1.1 of solo-python is now a dummy package pulling in solo1.

Ideally, this AUR package would be replaced by one called solo1 (presuming this is mostly used as a CLI, not as a Python library).

mutantmonkey commented on 2021-11-13 21:20 (UTC) (edited on 2021-11-13 21:21 (UTC) by mutantmonkey)

Just to be clear, the pip command in the install function just installs the wheel file that is built using flit in the build function. This is not a binary package.

jonathon commented on 2021-11-13 14:02 (UTC)

I put together a PKGBUILD for solo-python-git that uses the upstream source rather than pip. Have a look, and feel free to adopt any parts that are useful!

fluix commented on 2021-04-09 22:40 (UTC) (edited on 2021-04-09 22:40 (UTC) by fluix)

The issue that @billypilgrim pointer out is because python-solo request the Python package fido2 in version 0.8.1 (fido2~=0.8.1) not the newer 0.9 version.

billypilgrim commented on 2021-04-01 13:42 (UTC)

I'm currently getting the following error every time I try to run the solo program:

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/usr/bin/solo", line 5, in <module>
    from solo.cli import solo_cli
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/solo/cli/", line 17, in <module>
    from solo.cli.key import key
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/solo/cli/", line 24, in <module>
    import solo.fido2
  File "/usr/lib/python3.9/site-packages/solo/fido2/", line 3, in <module>
    import fido2._pyu2f
ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'fido2._pyu2f'

mutantmonkey commented on 2021-03-27 21:45 (UTC)

@Arlas Updated, thanks for the heads up. It looks like the new python-flit package in community does not install into /usr/bin.

@alium Upstream builds this package using flit (see the upstream Makefile). I understand that additional make dependencies are a concern, but I do not really have the desire or time to maintain a separate build process from upstream. If you have any particular suggestions for how I can better adhere to the Arch packaging guidelines without changing the build process, I'd be happy to adopt them.

alium commented on 2021-03-27 10:53 (UTC) (edited on 2021-03-27 10:53 (UTC) by alium)

hi, consider please switch to archlinux packaging standard, see

pkgdesc="Tools and Python library for SoloKeys."
license=('Apache' 'MIT')
depends=('python' 'python-click>=7.0' 'python-cryptography' 'python-ecdsa'
         'python-fido2' 'python-intelhex' 'python-pyserial' 'python-pyusb'
makedepends=('fakeroot' 'python-setuptools')

build() {
  cd $pkgname-$pkgver
  python build

package() {
  cd $pkgname-$pkgver
    python install --root="${pkgdir}" --optimize=1
  install -m755 -d "${pkgdir}/usr/bin"
  install -m755  "${srcdir}"/solo "${pkgdir}/usr/bin"

you can upload solo script just here in AUR