Package Details: sonyheadphonesclient-bin 5:1.3.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/sonyheadphonesclient-bin.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: sonyheadphonesclient-bin
Description: A {Windows, macOS, Linux} client recreating the functionality of the Sony Headphones app
Upstream URL: https://github.com/Plutoberth/SonyHeadphonesClient
Keywords:
Licenses: MIT
Submitter: quio
Maintainer: D3SOX
Last Packager: quio
Votes: 2
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2022-03-28 16:15 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2024-07-31 12:44 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

quio commented on 2022-03-28 16:32 (UTC)

AUR-Dependency

Needs glew 2.1.0 to be installed.

Latest Comments

1 2 Next › Last »

brionical27 commented on 2025-05-14 18:02 (UTC)

@D3ADSOX thanks, I've pushed some changes up to my repo that I think should make both packages interoperable for whoever might need it in the future

D3SOX commented on 2025-05-14 15:22 (UTC)

Or thinking about it, it would be even better to make it possible to have both installed because if somebody has a pair of WH1000-XM4's and XM5's they would need to switch the package every time

D3SOX commented on 2025-05-14 15:20 (UTC)

@brionical27 I think it would be better if we both added sonyheadphonesclient to provides so it already implicitly conflicts with each other

brionical27 commented on 2025-05-14 13:53 (UTC)

@D3SOX can you add my sonyheadphoneclient-bluetooth-bin into conflicts()

D3SOX commented on 2025-04-25 08:26 (UTC)

@quio I just adopted it. I'm on Arch and will be for the foreseeable future and I'm actively using the Sony WH-1000-XM4s

quio commented on 2025-04-25 08:25 (UTC)

As I am no longer using arch linux, I won't be able to update this package, so I will disown it for somebody else to pick up the work.

quio commented on 2024-07-31 12:46 (UTC)

According to the wiki, the MIT license has to be included in each package: "License families like BSD or MIT are, strictly speaking, not a single license and each instance requires a separate license file. In license variable refer to them using a common SPDX identifier (e.g. BSD-3-Clause or MIT), but then provide the corresponding file as if it was a custom license."

The split packages look good. I'm looking forward to be using the new PKGBUILD. The desktop entry has been updated.

D3SOX commented on 2024-07-31 12:34 (UTC)

Another thing I just noticed in your desktop entry it says Terminal=falsey. That's why it shows a terminal.

D3SOX commented on 2024-07-31 12:31 (UTC) (edited on 2024-07-31 12:33 (UTC) by D3SOX)

I think it would be best to have them both in one PKGBUILD as they are not that fundamentally different. Not sure what the exact term for this is but as an example you can look at the PKGBUILD for lightly-git I can implement that later and post the updated PKGBUILD

Also I'm unsure if we really need to install a custom MIT license. Pretty sure it's one of the ones supported by default

quio commented on 2024-07-31 12:26 (UTC)

@D3SOX removed the, no longer existing, optional dependency. I'd be happy to link to the other version if someone would create (and maintain) that package.

1 2 Next › Last »