Search Criteria
Package Details: soundfonts-aur-meta 20250530-1
Package Actions
Git Clone URL: | https://aur.archlinux.org/soundfonts-aur-meta.git (read-only, click to copy) |
---|---|
Package Base: | soundfonts-aur-meta |
Description: | Meta package depending on all avaiable soundfonts |
Upstream URL: | None |
Keywords: | bank meta sample soundfont |
Conflicts: | soundfont-opl3-fm-128m |
Submitter: | milkii |
Maintainer: | milkii (denilsonsa, oech3) |
Last Packager: | oech3 |
Votes: | 2 |
Popularity: | 0.000000 |
First Submitted: | 2019-04-16 08:38 (UTC) |
Last Updated: | 2025-07-02 23:00 (UTC) |
Dependencies (21)
- freepats-general-midi
- freepats-ydp-grand-pianoAUR
- soundfont-arachnoAUR
- soundfont-fatboyAUR
- soundfont-fluid
- soundfont-generaluserAUR
- soundfont-gmgsxAUR
- soundfont-jeuxAUR
- soundfont-opl3AUR
- soundfont-personalcopyAUR
- soundfont-realfontAUR
- soundfont-sgmAUR
- soundfont-sm64AUR
- soundfont-sso-sf2AUR
- soundfont-sunshine-percAUR
- soundfont-titanicAUR
- soundfont-unisonAUR
- soundfont-zelda3sf2AUR
- soundfont-zeldamcsf2AUR
- soundfont-ensemblesAUR (optional) – wrong install path
- Show 1 more dependencies...
Latest Comments
1 2 Next › Last »
oech3 commented on 2025-07-02 23:02 (UTC)
Added to
optdepends
at a moment. Alsosso-sfz
is successor ofsso-sf2
.denilsonsa commented on 2025-07-02 21:54 (UTC)
This has been flagged as out-of-date, but I think it is a mistake.
soundfont-sso-sfz
is indeed a soundfont, but it is installed in a different directory (/usr/share/sounds/
instead of/usr/share/soundfonts/
). It is also the only package providing a soundfont in SFZ format.Likewise,
soundfont-ensembles
exists, but installs files in a different location (for some reason) and thus is not included in this meta package.Additionally, it uses 1.4GB for that single soundfont, while this meta-package depending on 19 packages uses 2.6GB. The four largest existing soundfounts in SF2 format take 1.5GB (including the SSO in SF2 format, which alone takes 472MB).
Thus, given all these reasons, I'm not convinced that
soundfont-sso-sfz
should be added as a dependency.Granted, I'm not a musician and I don't know which software can take advantage of the SFZ format. If you think it should be included, an option would be to include it as an optional dependency. Any thoughts from anyone else?
oech3 commented on 2025-05-28 06:34 (UTC)
https://aur.archlinux.org/packages/soundfont-opl3-fm-128m#comment-1025894 may not source controled. Swapped until fixed.
Does anyone interested to
gm.dls
package? I did't found "clean" source for it yet.denilsonsa commented on 2025-05-23 08:51 (UTC)
I'm not sure, probably not. Because that means the version will change every day this PKGBUILD gets evaluated, which is probably not what we want. I've seen pkgver using the git commit version, but that's stable. The date/time isn't.
Bear in mind I'm not very experienced with the inner workings of PKGBUILD, so I may be wrong. Also, it seems you've been added as a co-maintainer as well.
oech3 commented on 2025-05-22 16:06 (UTC)
is it fine to
pkgver(){ date -u +"%Y%m%d" }
at next update ?denilsonsa commented on 2025-05-21 10:15 (UTC)
@oech3, looks correct.
I initially understood "merge request" as a "pull request", not as a "merge this package into another". That was my confusion.
oech3 commented on 2025-05-21 09:55 (UTC) (edited on 2025-05-21 10:01 (UTC) by oech3)
[Edit] by similar method with deletion (https://lists.archlinux.org/archives/list/aur-requests@lists.archlinux.org/thread/TG5WA3ZAO6YW3IFKWIFOYNQSMYNREHAI/)
(Is the merge target correct?)
denilsonsa commented on 2025-05-21 09:35 (UTC)
@oech3, wait, can we send merge requests for AUR packages? Where?
oech3 commented on 2025-05-21 09:20 (UTC) (edited on 2025-05-21 09:56 (UTC) by oech3)
package() { true }
andurl
is removable (maybe). I asked/sent a merge request for others.1 2 Next › Last »