Package Details: spideroak-one 7.5.0-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/spideroak-one.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: spideroak-one
Description: Secure file backup, sync and sharing client. This provides the client for SpiderOakONE.
Upstream URL: https://crossclave.com/
Keywords: backup
Licenses: custom
Conflicts: spideroak, spideroak-beta
Provides: spideroak
Replaces: spideroak
Submitter: coolpyrofreak
Maintainer: mbc
Last Packager: mbc
Votes: 269
Popularity: 0.014226
First Submitted: 2015-07-18 19:17 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2023-09-04 21:57 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. 27 Next › Last »

coolpyrofreak commented on 2017-01-10 15:31 (UTC)

@iegubkin - All I can tell you is that I can't reproduce your error. harfbuzz isn't a dependency, so it sounds like an upstream problem to me. You should contact SpiderOak support directly. https://spideroak.com/support

iegubkin commented on 2017-01-10 00:21 (UTC) (edited on 2017-01-10 03:21 (UTC) by iegubkin)

I'm confused. I re-installed the package and it gives the same error. $ wget -c https://aur.archlinux.org/cgit/aur.git/snapshot/spideroak-one.tar.gz $ tar -xvzf spideroak-one.tar.gz $ cd spideroak-one $ makepkg -s # pacman -U *.pkg.tar.xz Is this what you meant by "you might want to try re-running makepkg with a fresh git clone"? Thanks

coolpyrofreak commented on 2017-01-08 03:25 (UTC) (edited on 2017-01-08 04:17 (UTC) by coolpyrofreak)

@iegubkin - I'll try to figure this out tomorrow. It's entirely possible we'll need an upstream fix, though. EDIT - Just rebuilt the package with updated harfbuzz package, and it seems to be working fine. It executes from CLI without any errors, so you might want to try re-running makepkg with a fresh git clone.

iegubkin commented on 2017-01-08 03:12 (UTC)

The recent update of harfbuzz 1.3.4-1 to 1.4.1-1 seems to have killed spideroak-one. It crashes with: >> SpiderOakONE Traceback (most recent call last): File "<string>", line 6, in <module> File "__main__.py", line 128, in <module> File "__main__SpiderOakONE__.py", line 183, in <module> File "__main__SpiderOakONE__.py", line 168, in main File "oak/Oak.py", line 21, in <module> File "PyQt4/QtGui.py", line 26, in <module> File "PyQt4/QtGui.py", line 17, in _bbfreeze_import_dynamic_module ImportError: /usr/lib/libharfbuzz.so.0: undefined symbol: FT_Get_Var_Blend_Coordinates Similar to bug with Zim Desktop: https://bbs.archlinux.org/viewtopic.php?id=221648 "needs to be rebuilt against the new harfbuzz lib" downgrading back to 1.3.4-1 fixes the problem.

coolpyrofreak commented on 2016-06-03 01:34 (UTC)

I'm thinking about renaming this package to spideroakone (removing the hyphen) so that the package name is the same as SpiderOak's naming conventions. While it's not a big change, I wanted to advertise it before I made any changes. I'd appreciate any comments or thoughts anyone might have on this. Thanks!

scachemaille commented on 2016-04-25 21:52 (UTC) (edited on 2016-04-25 21:54 (UTC) by scachemaille)

A new version is out. The download link point to newer version 6.1.4 so the sha256sums is not valid anymore.

coolpyrofreak commented on 2016-03-11 23:56 (UTC)

@cfr42 - Sorry, I just have a habit of always using the -v flag with tar. I removed it from the PKGBUILD, so you should see a much cleaner build now.

cfr42 commented on 2016-03-11 22:24 (UTC)

Great to see the update - thanks for this. May I make the quite minor suggestion that the change to the package build which makes untarring the package verbose be undone when you next update? As far as I know, PKGBUILDs do not normally do this and I can't, to be honest, see the point. If there is a point, I think maybe adding a message explaining what users should look for in the output would be useful as it really isn't clear to me *why* I'm being given all this information, which makepkg does not provide for any other packages I've built! And apologies if this suggestion is off-base in some way. I realise you made the change for a reason, even if I cannot currently appreciate that reason.

lockheed commented on 2016-03-10 09:36 (UTC) (edited on 2016-03-10 09:43 (UTC) by lockheed)

==> Validating source files with sha256sums... terms.txt ... Passed ==> Validating source_x86_64 files with sha256sums... spideroakone_6.1.2_amd64.deb ... FAILED ==> ERROR: One or more files did not pass the validity check It's probably because the scripts downloads newer version 6.1.3

cfr42 commented on 2016-02-06 00:41 (UTC)

No worries - seems happy enough to build now ;).

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 .. 27 Next › Last »