Package Details: springseed 2.0-11

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/springseed.git (read-only)
Package Base: springseed
Description: Simply awesome note taking
Upstream URL: https://github.com/spsdco/notes
Keywords: notes office
Licenses: MIT
Submitter: devrs0
Maintainer: None
Last Packager: gspu
Votes: 29
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2013-08-02 17:46
Last Updated: 2018-05-05 16:17

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 2 3 4 5 6

devrs0 commented on 2013-08-09 17:53

The source is not gone. It is the same used by the official site.

The AUR parser obviously can't resolve the 'arch' variable so clicking on the above link will fail.

This is meant to be a stable-build package. The git sources require you to additionally build the Node Webkit package. I am only pulling in the LICENSE as it isn't included in the .deb file.

devrs0 commented on 2013-08-09 17:51

The source is not gone. It is the same used by the official site.

The AUR parser obviously doesn't handle variables very well. So, clicking on the above link will fail.

This is meant to be a stable-build package. The git sources require you to build the Node Webkit package yourself. I am only pulling in the LICENSE as it isn't included in the .deb file.

devrs0 commented on 2013-08-09 17:49

The source is not gone. It is the same used by the official site.

The AUR parser obviously doesn't handle variables so clicking on the above link will fail.

This is meant to be a stable-build package. The git sources require you to build the Node Webkit package yourself. I am only pulling in the LICENSE as it isn't included in the .deb file.

devrs0 commented on 2013-08-09 17:48

The source is not gone. It is the used by the official site.

The AUR parser obviously doesn't handle variables so clicking on the above link will fail.

This is meant to be a stable-build package. The git sources require you to build the Node Webkit package yourself. I am only pulling in the LICENSE as it isn't included in the .deb file.

roentgen commented on 2013-08-09 14:33

The source is gone.
Wouldn't it be better to use the git sources?