Package Details: sst 1.0.1-3

Git Clone URL: (read-only)
Package Base: sst
Description: The Classic Super Star Trek Game
Upstream URL:
Licenses: GPL
Submitter: None
Maintainer: keenerd
Last Packager: keenerd
Votes: 5
Popularity: 0.028348
First Submitted: 2011-06-23 16:37
Last Updated: 2016-01-11 13:34

Dependencies (1)

Required by (0)

Sources (1)

Latest Comments

ElVino commented on 2015-12-24 15:54

md5sum should be updated again, should be e5ce8d6bfd867afdbf6681a95ce0fd8f

WoodJRx commented on 2015-04-14 04:52

Adopted, corrected, disowned. I love the game, but don't want to be responsible for maintaining it.

keenerd commented on 2015-02-10 03:35

install -Dm644 "${srcdir}/sstsrc/sst.doc" "${pkgdir}/usr/share/doc/${pkgname}/sst"
should be
install -Dm644 "${srcdir}/sstsrc/sst.doc" "${pkgdir}/usr/share/doc/${pkgname}/sst.doc"
for the in-game help to work

reedlaw commented on 2015-02-10 00:56

The md5sum needs to be updated for the latest version. For the version I just downloaded it should be 206de9aa1c70630e9cc10bf48f208b07

BlackIkeEagle commented on 2012-05-02 08:30

sstlinux will be merged into sst

BlackIkeEagle commented on 2012-04-21 08:51

sstrek will be merged into sst (

Anonymous comment on 2012-04-21 08:25

Hi marko-v, currently there are 3 different versions of sst in the AUR providing the same application. One of them is mine, simply called sst. I created it because sst is the name given to the project upstream.

Is it ok for you if sstlinux and sstreck are being merged into sst (I think this means that all votes are being combined, so you won't lose anything) and then maintain sst?

Anonymous comment on 2012-04-20 18:27

I just think that my package name is the correct one, the others are just wrong. But I'll ask for its deletion on the mailinglist, I don't even remember why I put this here, I never played that game.

Anonymous comment on 2012-04-20 08:45

Hmm, these packages are duplicates of yours:

'sstrek' has more votes than others. Maybe you adopt and update it? Then all copies can be removed to avoid confusion.

Anonymous comment on 2011-10-14 18:18

updated, sorry for the delay! It's an ugly hack, but at least it works. Looks like this crappy zip file cannot be unzipped with bsdtar, so I have to do it manually with unzip.

Anonymous comment on 2011-09-24 15:45

I see, I get that too. Strange though, manually extracting the zip file works fine, if it's being extracted during the makepkg process the extracted files are all 0-byte files. I'll look into this, thanks nexus7 for reporting!

Anonymous comment on 2011-09-24 15:29

==> Beginning build()...
make: *** No targets found. Exiting.