Package Details: sublime-text-2 2.0.2-2

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/sublime-text-2.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: sublime-text-2
Description: Sophisticated text editor for code, html and prose (legacy version)
Upstream URL: https://www.sublimetext.com/2
Licenses: custom: commercial
Submitter: SunRed
Maintainer: carstene1ns
Last Packager: SunRed
Votes: 543
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2022-11-15 17:00 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2022-11-15 17:00 (UTC)

Latest Comments

« First ‹ Previous 1 .. 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 Next › Last »

<deleted-account> commented on 2012-02-23 11:41 (UTC)

Same here with Xfce.

<deleted-account> commented on 2012-02-23 11:13 (UTC)

Icon isn't showing for me.

jiggak commented on 2012-02-23 01:32 (UTC)

Updated to build 2181... enjoy the pretty new icon! The new icon seems to show up as expected in all the gnome3 place (ie: nautilus and gnome-shell). Let me know if other desktop managers have a problem finding it.

drizz commented on 2012-01-07 01:38 (UTC)

@jigakk This build does not have automatic .sublime-project handling, it's the `subl` bash-script that handles that. Automatic handling is implemented in build 2144 which is available in the dev channel (see http://www.sublimetext.com/dev) I am not able to replicate the bug at given time, as I don't know what's causing it. I run into it rather often when trying to open certain files on certain occasions, from the terminal. I will report back when I run into it again.

jiggak commented on 2012-01-06 14:56 (UTC)

@drizz I'm not sure what you mean. I have build 2138 which looks to be latest. This build has .sublime-project handling but I'm afraid I don't use that on a regular basis so I can't say for sure if there is a problem with it. Are you seeing some sort of buggy behavior with build 2144? If so where did you get the build? Can you list the steps required to replicated the bug?

drizz commented on 2012-01-06 14:39 (UTC)

Is it still deemed necessary to control whether or not `sublime_text` processes should start in the background? Build 2144 introduced (albeit not “stable” yet) .sublime-project handling and the current `subl` script doesn't always start it in the background like it should.

stefanwilkens commented on 2011-11-16 15:57 (UTC)

you should mention that this is an evaluation version, it will nag for licenses after a while. evaluation license is unlimited in both time and functionality

jiggak commented on 2011-11-10 22:56 (UTC)

Package version 3 fixes a bug in the launch script causing file names with spaces to open in separate tabs.

<deleted-account> commented on 2011-11-06 23:42 (UTC)

@jiggak Thanks for the clarification. I agree with you, subl suits ok.

<deleted-account> commented on 2011-11-05 15:11 (UTC)

to run sublime the following library is required: libpng12. the library can be obtained from AUR libpng12 1.2.46-2 at: https://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=33795