Package Details: sublime-text2 2.0.2-1

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/sublime-text2.git (read-only)
Package Base: sublime-text2
Description: Sophisticated text editor for code, html and prose (legacy version)
Upstream URL: https://www.sublimetext.com/2
Licenses: custom: commercial
Conflicts: sublime-text
Submitter: carstene1ns
Maintainer: carstene1ns
Last Packager: carstene1ns
Votes: 561
Popularity: 1.755590
First Submitted: 2017-10-03 21:22
Last Updated: 2017-10-03 21:22

Latest Comments

TheChickenMan commented on 2017-09-19 13:50

I'm not sure I really like the idea of adding additional repositories to pacman. I like keeping my official packages only with pacman and my AUR stuff separate.

davidgxxl commented on 2017-09-18 21:11

I just update this today(3144) and when try open sublime text I got "enter license key" dialog...

I dont know if there any issue with that version, but now I'm using the sublime text stable official reposity for pacman https://www.sublimetext.com/docs/3/linux_repositories.html

Regards.

carstene1ns commented on 2017-09-14 14:04

Yes, my plan is to reupload this package as sublime-text2 and file a merge request.
However, the recommended way to get sublime text 3 is via the custom pacman repo.
Therefore my idea is to provide a package "sublime-text-repository" or something that adds it, so pacman will manage the updates.
I have no intention to block this package base, so current dev/nighly package maintainer (@sender) may upload their sublime-text (version 3) here.

jkwill87 commented on 2017-09-13 22:09

My $0.02: sublime-text should be updated to Sublime Text 3. Modernity is one of Arch's core principles, and as such sublime-text should reflect the latest upstream version. Package naming should follow suit to python, another package with a divisive update between 2 to 3, where the package for Sublime Text 2 could just moved over to something like sublime-text2 or sublime-text-2.

nathan-osman commented on 2017-09-13 16:42

Now that Sublime Text 3 is out (https://www.sublimetext.com/blog/articles/sublime-text-3-point-0), will this package be upgraded?

Geen commented on 2016-12-14 04:06

Any solution for install error ??
==> ERROR: Failure while downloading http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libpng/libpng-1.6.2.tar.xz
Aborting...

lonaowna commented on 2016-10-17 08:31

The .install file is no longer needed. All functions are already handled by hooks (/usr/share/libalpm/hooks/{gtk-update-icon-cache.hook,update-desktop-database.hook,update-mime-database.hook})

bijanbina commented on 2016-07-12 19:31

the following libpng and libpng-apng links were broken
http://downloads.sourceforge.net/libpng/libpng-1.6.2.tar.xz

flisboac commented on 2016-03-13 06:23

I want to bring your attention to this issue regarding Sublime Text 2 and Package Control: https://github.com/wbond/package_control/issues/874#issuecomment-195887034

It seems the usage of the Python 2.7 library instead of Python 2.6 may be the cause of some incompatibilities with some packages. I suggest extracting /opt/sublime-text/lib/python26.zip to /opt/sublime-text/lib/python2.6 instead of symlinking /usr/lib/python2.7 to /opt/sublime-text/lib/python2.6.

ventosus commented on 2016-01-26 08:40

The check in sublime-text.sh to run in foreground vs background seems to be wrong and even unnecessary.

---
if [[ -n ${PID} ]]; then
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/sublime-text/lib ${BIN} ${ARGS} "$@"
else
LD_LIBRARY_PATH=/opt/sublime-text/lib ${BIN} ${ARGS} "$@" &
fi
---

Please remove the whole check or at least change the checking mode to the correct one (-z instead of -n)

All comments