Package Details: sucrack 1.2.3-6

Git Clone URL: https://aur.archlinux.org/sucrack.git (read-only, click to copy)
Package Base: sucrack
Description: a multi-threaded Linux/UNIX tool for brute-force cracking local user accounts via su
Upstream URL: http://labs.portcullis.co.uk/application/sucrack
Licenses: custom
Submitter: sanerb
Maintainer: sanerb
Last Packager: sanerb
Votes: 0
Popularity: 0.000000
First Submitted: 2015-08-25 00:01 (UTC)
Last Updated: 2016-06-25 21:28 (UTC)

Pinned Comments

sanerb commented on 2016-06-26 06:19 (UTC) (edited on 2017-09-01 22:59 (UTC) by sanerb)

Please note the following additions: # Bug reports can be filed at https://bugs.square-r00t.net/index.php?project=3 # News updates for packages can be followed at https://devblog.square-r00t.net (If you want an RSS-feed only pertaining to my AUR packages, you can subscribe to https://devblog.square-r00t.net/rss/?category=aur in your favourite RSS reader.) Note that you should still use the AUR web interface for flagging packages as out-of-date if a new version is released; the aforementioned bug tracker is to aid in issues with building/packaging/the PKGBUILD formats/etc. specifically. GPG signature "errors" are explained here: https://devblog.square-r00t.net/articles/a-note-on-using-gpg-signatures-in-pkgbuilds Please read; it's not a bug. Thanks!

Latest Comments

sanerb commented on 2016-06-26 06:19 (UTC) (edited on 2017-09-01 22:59 (UTC) by sanerb)

Please note the following additions: # Bug reports can be filed at https://bugs.square-r00t.net/index.php?project=3 # News updates for packages can be followed at https://devblog.square-r00t.net (If you want an RSS-feed only pertaining to my AUR packages, you can subscribe to https://devblog.square-r00t.net/rss/?category=aur in your favourite RSS reader.) Note that you should still use the AUR web interface for flagging packages as out-of-date if a new version is released; the aforementioned bug tracker is to aid in issues with building/packaging/the PKGBUILD formats/etc. specifically. GPG signature "errors" are explained here: https://devblog.square-r00t.net/articles/a-note-on-using-gpg-signatures-in-pkgbuilds Please read; it's not a bug. Thanks!